II.
The development of library collections in support of an institution’s
instruction and research programs should transcend the personal values of the
selector to contain materials representing a variety of perspectives on
subjects that may be considered controversial.
The
Mill (1859) and Woodward
(1990) agree that there can never be a justification for censorship. They
both argued that censorship posed a two-fold problem: first, who does the censoring
and, second, how can you know what to censor if you never have all the
facts? Doyle (2001, p. 68) sums up Mill by stating, “censors . . .
presume to settle controversial questions for others without allowing those
others to hear what the opposition has to say.” Intellectual freedom,
especially in an academic situation, must be allowed at all costs. The
controversial must be in the academic library. Doubting students’ ability
to understand something is immaterial. (Nesta and Blanke, 1991) So many people do not understand so
much of what is fed to them from the television news media that it makes
worrying about college students confusing something seem pedantic.
"Librarians would like to take advantage of student, enthusiasm, creativity,
and technical skills. At the same time, librarians observe the general
and growing lack of literacy among students, along with flexible ethics that
tolerate plagiarism and copyright violations and show a general lack of respect
for scholarship and research." (Hisle,
2002) If librarians cannot rely on students knowing that something is
incorrect, then they need to work with faculty to educate students in library
use, copyright, and general research. If every freshman class had to take
a course on research and library use it would solve many of the research
confusions that exist in colleges across the country.