<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Rangeland Ecology &amp; Management, Volume 61, Number 5 (September 2008)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10150/635410" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10150/635410</id>
<updated>2026-06-10T15:52:22Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T15:52:22Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Short-Term Mesquite Pod Consumption by Goats Does Not Induce Toxicity</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10150/642985" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cook, Robert W.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Scott, Cody B.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hartmann, F. Steve</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10150/642985</id>
<updated>2020-09-06T01:29:01Z</updated>
<published>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Short-Term Mesquite Pod Consumption by Goats Does Not Induce Toxicity
Cook, Robert W.; Scott, Cody B.; Hartmann, F. Steve
Goats, unlike cattle, disperse few viable mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torr.) seeds in feces. However, there is some evidence that goats may suffer from toxicosis from overingestion of mesquite pods. We assessed the likelihood that short-term ingestion of mesquite pods would induce toxicosis in goats. Twenty-four goats were randomly allocated to one of four treatments with treatments fed different concentrations (0%, 30%, 60%, or 90% of the diet) of whole mesquite pods fed with alfalfa pellets. The mixture of mesquite pods and alfalfa pellets was fed for 12 d to 14 d. Because there were only 12 pens available for the study, two trials were used so that all 24 goats could be housed in individual pens. Intake, serum metabolite levels, and fecal output were measured to assess physiological status. In Trial 1, intake and fecal output decreased on days 12 through 14 for goats consuming a diet of 90% mesquite pods. In the second trial, intake and fecal output were similar across days of feeding within each treatment, but the trial only lasted 12 d. Serum metabolite levels remained within normal levels irrespective of the amount of mesquite pods in the diet in both trials. Goats appear to be able to consume mesquite pods on a short-term basis without experiencing toxicosis. 
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Common Broomweed Growth Characteristics in Cleared and Woody Landscapes</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10150/642984" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Stanford, Roy L.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Ansley, R. James</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Ransom, Dean</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10150/642984</id>
<updated>2020-09-06T01:28:54Z</updated>
<published>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Common Broomweed Growth Characteristics in Cleared and Woody Landscapes
Stanford, Roy L.; Ansley, R. James; Ransom, Dean
Common broomweed (Amphiachyris dracunculoides [DC] Nutt. Ex Rydb.) is an annual forb that occurs throughout the southern Great Plains, USA. During years of abundant growth, broomweed is problematic because it can reduce grass production and interfere with livestock foraging. In contrast, the canopy structure of broomweed may provide habitat cover for wildlife, including the northern bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus Linnaeus). During an extreme outbreak of broomweed in north Texas in 2007, we observed apparent differences in broomweed individual plant growth characteristics in mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torr.) woodland areas versus areas that had recently been cleared of mesquite. Our objective was to document differences at the individual plant and population levels. Individual plant mass, canopy diameter, and basal stem diameter were much greater in the cleared treatment than the mesquite woodland. In contrast, plant height was greater in the woodland than in the cleared treatment. Population variables of stand-level production, percentage canopy cover, plant density, and visual obstruction were not different between treatments. Total perennial grass production was greater in the cleared than the woodland treatment, because of the negative effect of mesquite on grass production. Variations in broomweed growth characteristics may have implications regarding livestock foraging and wildlife habitat. 
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Jaguar and Puma Predation on Cattle Calves in Northeastern Sonora, Mexico</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10150/642983" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rosas-Rosas, Octavio C.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bender, Louis C.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valdez, Raul</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10150/642983</id>
<updated>2020-09-06T01:28:47Z</updated>
<published>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Jaguar and Puma Predation on Cattle Calves in Northeastern Sonora, Mexico
Rosas-Rosas, Octavio C.; Bender, Louis C.; Valdez, Raul
Predation by jaguars (Panthera onca) and pumas (Puma concolor) is often a source of conflict with cattle ranching in northeastern Sonora, Mexico. Because jaguars are endangered in Mexico, such conflicts have biological, social, and economic consequences. We documented the extent of predation by jaguars and pumas on cattle in 1999-2004 in northeastern Sonora, where the northernmost breeding population of jaguars exists in North America. Jaguars and pumas killed only calves , 12 mo old, and calves constituted 58% of prey biomass consumed by jaguars and 9% by pumas. Annual cause-specific mortality rates of confirmed jaguar predation (&lt; 0.018), confirmed and suspected jaguar predation (&lt; 0.018), and all confirmed and suspected large felid predation (&lt; 0.018) were low and cattle calf survival was high (0.89-0.98 annually). If calves reported as missing but for which no evidence of mortality could be found were classed as large felid predation, annual cause-specific rates increased to 0.006-0.038. Collectively, confirmed jaguar and puma predation accounted for &lt; 14% (57/408) of total cattle losses, with jaguars responsible for 14% of all calf losses; this could increase to a maximum of 36% (146/408) if missing calves were included in the totals. While jaguar and puma predation may have an impact on some small cattle operations, it is generally minor compared to losses from other causes in northeastern Sonora. Moreover, 91% of all confirmed calf kills were associated with three individual jaguars in our study. Targeting problem cats rather than broad-scale predator control may therefore be a viable alternative to address chronic predation problems. Because most (83%) instances of jaguar predation occurred during the dry season along thick riparian habitats, modified cattle husbandry operations, such as establishment of permanent water sources in uplands and away from dense vegetative cover, could ameliorate many cases of predation by jaguars on cattle. 
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Does Doramectin Use on Cattle Indirectly Affect the Endangered Burrowing Owl?</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10150/642982" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Floate, Kevin D.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bouchard, Patrice</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Holroyd, Geoff</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Poulin, Ray</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Wellicome, Troy I.</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10150/642982</id>
<updated>2020-09-06T01:28:39Z</updated>
<published>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Does Doramectin Use on Cattle Indirectly Affect the Endangered Burrowing Owl?
Floate, Kevin D.; Bouchard, Patrice; Holroyd, Geoff; Poulin, Ray; Wellicome, Troy I.
Doramectin is one of several endectocide compounds widely used to treat nematode and arthropod pests affecting cattle. Insecticidal residues in dung of endectocide-treated cattle can reduce numbers of dung-breeding insects. Concerns have been raised that use of endectocides may adversely affect birds that rely on dung-breeding insects as food. However, these concerns have not been specifically addressed in previous studies. We performed two studies to collectively assess whether doramectin adversely affects burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia Molina), which are listed as ‘‘Endangered’’ in Canada. In the first study, insect emergence was monitored from dung of cattle treated with a recommended topical dose of doramectin. Experiments replicated in each of 3 yr showed residues reduce the number of insects developing in dung of cattle treated up to 16 wk previously. In the second study, we identified prey items from regurgitated pellets collected at 206 burrowing owl nests in southern Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada. A total of 50 213 prey items were identified, of which 90% were invertebrates. Beetles (Coleoptera) comprised 54% of the total prey items, followed next in abundance by grasshoppers (Acrididae, 20%) and crickets (Gryllidae, 16%). Of the beetles, 1 381 specimens were identified as breeding in dung (mainly species of Aphodius, Canthon, Onthophagus). The dung beetles comprised an estimated 2.8% of the total prey items or 0.1% of total prey biomass. Results of the first study validate initial concerns that doramectin use can reduce numbers of insects breeding in dung of treated cattle. Results of the second study show reliance of burrowing owls on dung beetles is sufficiently low that use of doramectin on cattle is unlikely to appreciably affect the food supply of co-occurring burrowing owls. 
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
