AffiliationUniversity of Arizona
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherUniversity of Arizona Linguistics Circle
AbstractThis paper presents a formal account of the critical difference between standard nominalization and “mixed nominalization” (aka. nominal gerunds) of Chomsky (1970). Using patterns of morphological/syntactic distribution, binding properties, polarity effects and lexical semantic variation, I show that nominal gerunds which have been considered to be near identical to derived nominals are in fact quite distinct. I show that “object arguments” (understood objects of the root) of nominal gerunds fail every test of argumenthood and that the structural relations within these constructions are significantly different than those of derived nominals and verb phrases.
CollectionsCoyote Papers: Volume 17 (2010)
The following license files are associated with this item: