RoMEO Studies 5: IPR issues facing OAI Data and Service Providers
| dc.contributor.author | Gadd, Elizabeth | |
| dc.contributor.author | Oppenheim, Charles | |
| dc.contributor.author | Probets, Steve | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2004-12-08T00:00:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-06-18T23:23:26Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2003 | en_US |
| dc.date.submitted | 2004-12-08 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | RoMEO Studies 5: IPR issues facing OAI Data and Service Providers 2003, | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105308 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper is the fifth in a series of studies emanating from the UK JISC-funded RoMEO Project (Rights Metadata for Open-archiving). It reports the results of two surveys of OAI Data Providers (DPs) and Service Providers (SPs) with regards to the rights issues they face. It finds that very few DPs have rights agreements with depositing authors and that there is no standard approach to the creation of rights metadata. This paper considers the rights protection afforded individual and collections of metadata records under UK Law and contrasts this with DP and SP's views on the right status of metadata and how they wish to protect it. The majority of DPs and SPs believe that a standard way of describing both the rights status of documents and of metadata would be useful. This article is an unrefereed preprint. | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.subject | Scholarly Communication | en_US |
| dc.title | RoMEO Studies 5: IPR issues facing OAI Data and Service Providers | en_US |
| dc.type | Report | en_US |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-08-21T11:27:58Z | |
| html.description.abstract | This paper is the fifth in a series of studies emanating from the UK JISC-funded RoMEO Project (Rights Metadata for Open-archiving). It reports the results of two surveys of OAI Data Providers (DPs) and Service Providers (SPs) with regards to the rights issues they face. It finds that very few DPs have rights agreements with depositing authors and that there is no standard approach to the creation of rights metadata. This paper considers the rights protection afforded individual and collections of metadata records under UK Law and contrasts this with DP and SP's views on the right status of metadata and how they wish to protect it. The majority of DPs and SPs believe that a standard way of describing both the rights status of documents and of metadata would be useful. This article is an unrefereed preprint. |
