Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCampbell, D. Grant
dc.contributor.editorJacob, Elin K.en_US
dc.contributor.editorKwasnik, Barbaraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-22T00:00:01Z
dc.date.available2010-06-18T23:27:12Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.date.submitted2009-07-22en_US
dc.identifier.citationTensions Between Language and Discourse in North American Knowledge Organization 2009, Vol 2:10-16en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/105546
dc.description.abstractThis paper uses Paul Ricoeur's distinction between language and discourse to help define a North American research agenda in knowledge organization. Ricoeur's concept of discourse as a set of utterances, defined within multiple disciplines and domains, and reducible, not to the word but to the sentence, provides three useful tools for defining our research. First, it enables us to recognize the important contribution of numerous studies that focus on acts of organization, rather than on standards or tools of organization. Second, it gives us a harmonious paradigm that helps us reconcile the competing demands of interoperability, based on widely-used tools and techniques of library science, and domain integrity, based on user warrant and an understanding of local context. Finally, it resonates with the current economic, political and social climate in which our information systems work, particularly the competing calls for protectionism and globalization.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge Organizationen_US
dc.subjectInformation Systemsen_US
dc.subject.otherdiscourseen_US
dc.subject.otherresearch agendaen_US
dc.subject.otheracts of organizationen_US
dc.titleTensions Between Language and Discourse in North American Knowledge Organizationen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-06-27T11:03:06Z
html.description.abstractThis paper uses Paul Ricoeur's distinction between language and discourse to help define a North American research agenda in knowledge organization. Ricoeur's concept of discourse as a set of utterances, defined within multiple disciplines and domains, and reducible, not to the word but to the sentence, provides three useful tools for defining our research. First, it enables us to recognize the important contribution of numerous studies that focus on acts of organization, rather than on standards or tools of organization. Second, it gives us a harmonious paradigm that helps us reconcile the competing demands of interoperability, based on widely-used tools and techniques of library science, and domain integrity, based on user warrant and an understanding of local context. Finally, it resonates with the current economic, political and social climate in which our information systems work, particularly the competing calls for protectionism and globalization.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
NASKO2009_02_Campbell.pdf
Size:
164.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record