Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoodman, David
dc.date.accessioned2005-04-01T00:00:01Z
dc.date.available2010-06-18T23:36:16Z
dc.date.issued2004-11en_US
dc.date.submitted2005-04-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Criteria for Open Access 2004-11, 30(4):258-270 Serials Reviewen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/105891
dc.descriptionSpecial Issue: Open Access 2004, doi:10l1016/j.serrev.2004.09.009en_US
dc.description.abstractEach proposal for Open Access (OA) has its unique combination of features; each argument for or against OA focuses on particular features or criteria. This article is intended to discuss these criteria, both individually and also as each of them contributes to the different proposals for OA. Evaluation of the proposals themselves is not attempted. This discussion is intended to be of value to the supporters of OA, in choosing which plan to adopt, and to those opposed to OA, in showing where the weaknesses do and do not lie. In other words, this article intends to improve the level of factual understanding in the ongoing discussions.
dc.format.mimetypedocen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectScholarly Communicationen_US
dc.subjectElectronic Publishingen_US
dc.subject.otherOpen Accessen_US
dc.titleThe Criteria for Open Accessen_US
dc.typeJournal Article (Paginated)en_US
dc.identifier.journalSerials Reviewen_US
html.description.abstractEach proposal for Open Access (OA) has its unique combination of features; each argument for or against OA focuses on particular features or criteria. This article is intended to discuss these criteria, both individually and also as each of them contributes to the different proposals for OA. Evaluation of the proposals themselves is not attempted. This discussion is intended to be of value to the supporters of OA, in choosing which plan to adopt, and to those opposed to OA, in showing where the weaknesses do and do not lie. In other words, this article intends to improve the level of factual understanding in the ongoing discussions.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
SR30_4_Goodman.doc
Size:
343Kb
Format:
Microsoft Word

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record