Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSonnenwald, Diane H.
dc.contributor.authorIivonen, Mirja
dc.contributor.authorAlpi, Jeffrey A.
dc.contributor.authorKokkinen, Heli
dc.contributor.editorEurelings, A.en_US
dc.contributor.editorGastkemper, F.en_US
dc.contributor.editorKommers, P.en_US
dc.contributor.editorLewis, R.en_US
dc.contributor.editorvan Meel, R.en_US
dc.contributor.editorMelief, B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-23T00:00:01Z
dc.date.available2010-06-18T23:37:18Z
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-06-23en_US
dc.identifier.citationCollaborative Learning Using Collaboration Technology: Report from the Field 1999, :241-258 Integrating Information and Communications Technology to Higher Educationen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/105954
dc.description.abstractWe propose that emerging collaboration, or groupware, technology that supports synchronous interaction among students and faculty can add new aspects to the traditional distance learning and university course models. To explore this assumption we taught a masters' level university course using collaboration technology. In our approach, collaboration technology (integrated synchronous audio- and video-conferencing, electronic whiteboard and shared application tools) was used to provide students at universities in different countries opportunities to participate in interactive class exercises and discussions, and to do class assignments together. Students also participated in traditional, face-to-face class seminars, discussions and exercises at their local university. Thus students learned using collaboration technology and traditional methods. In this paper we describe the course and discuss students' evaluations of the course, their collaboration with each other, and collaboration technology used during the course. Students evaluated the course and their collaborative experiences very highly but reported unique challenges and had mixed impressions with respect to the technology. Challenges included establishing interpersonal communication and meeting commitments. In general, students judged collaboration technology lower than e-mail and telephony in characteristics such as social presence, participation and ease of use. However, there were differences in evaluations among students in Chapel Hill and Oulu implying cultural preferences. In addition, students reported varying degrees of productivity and variety of tasks afforded the technology. These differences were similar for students in Chapel Hill and Oulu, implying individual preferences influenced evaluation of the technology. These results appear to imply that students need to learn principles of collaboration in addition to the technology for collaborative learning across distances to occur, and that a variety of technologies are needed to accommodate cultural and individual differences among students.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Publishersen_US
dc.subjectDistributed Learningen_US
dc.subjectSocial Informaticsen_US
dc.subjectLibrary and Information Science Educationen_US
dc.subject.othercollaborationen_US
dc.subject.othertechnologyen_US
dc.subject.otherdistance educationen_US
dc.titleCollaborative Learning Using Collaboration Technology: Report from the Fielden_US
dc.typeBook Chapteren_US
dc.identifier.journalIntegrating Information and Communications Technology to Higher Educationen_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-21T15:28:34Z
html.description.abstractWe propose that emerging collaboration, or groupware, technology that supports synchronous interaction among students and faculty can add new aspects to the traditional distance learning and university course models. To explore this assumption we taught a masters' level university course using collaboration technology. In our approach, collaboration technology (integrated synchronous audio- and video-conferencing, electronic whiteboard and shared application tools) was used to provide students at universities in different countries opportunities to participate in interactive class exercises and discussions, and to do class assignments together. Students also participated in traditional, face-to-face class seminars, discussions and exercises at their local university. Thus students learned using collaboration technology and traditional methods. In this paper we describe the course and discuss students' evaluations of the course, their collaboration with each other, and collaboration technology used during the course. Students evaluated the course and their collaborative experiences very highly but reported unique challenges and had mixed impressions with respect to the technology. Challenges included establishing interpersonal communication and meeting commitments. In general, students judged collaboration technology lower than e-mail and telephony in characteristics such as social presence, participation and ease of use. However, there were differences in evaluations among students in Chapel Hill and Oulu implying cultural preferences. In addition, students reported varying degrees of productivity and variety of tasks afforded the technology. These differences were similar for students in Chapel Hill and Oulu, implying individual preferences influenced evaluation of the technology. These results appear to imply that students need to learn principles of collaboration in addition to the technology for collaborative learning across distances to occur, and that a variety of technologies are needed to accommodate cultural and individual differences among students.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
1999-book-chapter.pdf
Size:
193.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record