Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchallier, Wouter
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-24T00:00:01Z
dc.date.available2010-06-18T23:38:10Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.date.submitted2007-09-24en_US
dc.identifier.citationInformation Literacy in Academic Curricula - A Case Study of Integration at the Biomedical Faculties of K.U. Leuven University 2007,en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/106008
dc.descriptionaward winner of the best oral presentation, European Association for Health Information & Libraries Workshop 2007, Kraków, Poland, 12-15 September 2007en_US
dc.description.abstractSince 2006, the Campus Library of Biomedical Sciences of K.U.Leuven University is reconsidering its role in education and research. Giving access to scientific information is still our libraryâ s most important mission. However, teaching our students and academic staff the skills for efficient retrieval and use of scientific information is increasingly becoming an important task too. In the past, instruction was limited to guided tours and short library instruction sessions, organized on an individual and unsystematic basis. This changed in 2006, when we were asked by the Faculty of Medicine to reconsider part of the medical curriculum in the light of integrating information literacy in it. The following considerations were made: 1. information literacy should be integrated in a systematic way in the curriculum 2. minimal skills of information literacy should be determined for each level 3. instruction in information literacy should be a continuous line starting in the first and ending in the last year (vertical line) 4. information literacy should be acquired in an active way in as many courses as possible (horizontal line) 5. instruction in information literacy is a shared responsibility of library and academic staff As a result, the biomedical library was given the responsibility of information literacy in the beginning of the curriculum of medical students, while academic staff took the responsibility of the rest. At the same time, the library was investing a lot in providing our academic staff with tools, formats and learning objects for integrating information literacy in their lessons. We also started planning systematic trainings for keeping our academic staff up to date with major changes in scientific information. The new curriculum of the Faculty of Medicine was put into practice in October 2006. It was soon followed by similar projects in all other biomedical faculties of our university.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectinformation literacyen_US
dc.subjectintegration in the biomedical curriculumen_US
dc.subjectbiomedical sciencesen_US
dc.subjectinformation skillsen_US
dc.subjectmedicineen_US
dc.subjectlibrary trainingen_US
dc.subjectlifelong learningen_US
dc.subjectpublic health literacyen_US
dc.subjectmedical curriculumen_US
dc.subjectnullen_US
dc.subjectInformation Literacyen_US
dc.subjectTrainingen_US
dc.subjectLibrary and Information Science Educationen_US
dc.titleInformation Literacy in Academic Curricula - A Case Study of Integration at the Biomedical Faculties of K.U. Leuven Universityen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-21T15:30:32Z
html.description.abstractSince 2006, the Campus Library of Biomedical Sciences of K.U.Leuven University is reconsidering its role in education and research. Giving access to scientific information is still our libraryâ s most important mission. However, teaching our students and academic staff the skills for efficient retrieval and use of scientific information is increasingly becoming an important task too. In the past, instruction was limited to guided tours and short library instruction sessions, organized on an individual and unsystematic basis. This changed in 2006, when we were asked by the Faculty of Medicine to reconsider part of the medical curriculum in the light of integrating information literacy in it. The following considerations were made: 1. information literacy should be integrated in a systematic way in the curriculum 2. minimal skills of information literacy should be determined for each level 3. instruction in information literacy should be a continuous line starting in the first and ending in the last year (vertical line) 4. information literacy should be acquired in an active way in as many courses as possible (horizontal line) 5. instruction in information literacy is a shared responsibility of library and academic staff As a result, the biomedical library was given the responsibility of information literacy in the beginning of the curriculum of medical students, while academic staff took the responsibility of the rest. At the same time, the library was investing a lot in providing our academic staff with tools, formats and learning objects for integrating information literacy in their lessons. We also started planning systematic trainings for keeping our academic staff up to date with major changes in scientific information. The new curriculum of the Faculty of Medicine was put into practice in October 2006. It was soon followed by similar projects in all other biomedical faculties of our university.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Schallier.pdf
Size:
146.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record