Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMulvaney, John Philip
dc.date.accessioned2005-04-01T00:00:01Z
dc.date.available2010-06-18T23:38:19Z
dc.date.issued1990-09en_US
dc.date.submitted2005-04-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationResponse to Elitism 1990-09, 51(8):730-732 College & Research Libraries Newsen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/106020
dc.description.abstractThis article argues the improper of terming "elite" in the evaluation of LIS programs by Herubel's research. It disagrees with Herubel about her definition and analytical strategies.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectLibrary and Information Science Educationen_US
dc.subject.otherLibrary school facultyen_US
dc.subject.otherCross-breedingen_US
dc.subject.otherEducationen_US
dc.titleResponse to Elitismen_US
dc.typeJournal Article (Paginated)en_US
dc.identifier.journalCollege & Research Libraries Newsen_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-21T15:31:17Z
html.description.abstractThis article argues the improper of terming "elite" in the evaluation of LIS programs by Herubel's research. It disagrees with Herubel about her definition and analytical strategies.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Mulvaney_3.pdf
Size:
47.31Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record