Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBurke, Brian
dc.contributor.authorLeckman, Phil
dc.contributor.authorSturzen, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorVan Vlack, Kathleen
dc.contributor.authorVillanueva, Hecky
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-20T23:54:08Z
dc.date.available2010-08-20T23:54:08Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationArizona Anthropologist 17:76-90. © 2006 Arizona Anthropologisten_US
dc.identifier.issn1062-1601
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/110025
dc.description.abstractWriting is critical to two main anthropological goals: to communicate useful knowledge about humanity and society; and to stimulate interest, discussion, and action on issues that are of societal import. To achieve these goals anthropologists must write in accessible styles for diverse audiences. In this paper, we review the work of five popular nonfiction writers to determine the extent to which their approachable writing styles are compatible with anthropological rigor and nuance. While none of these authors meets all of our hopes for anthropological analysis, each does manage to blend some elements of scholarship with a readable style. We therefore highlight some of their stylistic approaches in the hope that these might help anthropologists engage more effectively in public debate.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Arizona, Department of Anthropologyen_US
dc.subjectnon-fiction writingen_US
dc.subjectNew New Journalismen_US
dc.subjectpolitics of representationen_US
dc.subjectreflexivityen_US
dc.titleLessons from New New Journalismen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Arizonaen_US
dc.identifier.journalArizona Anthropologisten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-07-13T04:58:57Z
html.description.abstractWriting is critical to two main anthropological goals: to communicate useful knowledge about humanity and society; and to stimulate interest, discussion, and action on issues that are of societal import. To achieve these goals anthropologists must write in accessible styles for diverse audiences. In this paper, we review the work of five popular nonfiction writers to determine the extent to which their approachable writing styles are compatible with anthropological rigor and nuance. While none of these authors meets all of our hopes for anthropological analysis, each does manage to blend some elements of scholarship with a readable style. We therefore highlight some of their stylistic approaches in the hope that these might help anthropologists engage more effectively in public debate.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_gn1_a785_n17_76_90_v.pdf
Size:
692.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record