Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLaMotta, Vincent M.
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-24T01:09:21Z
dc.date.available2010-08-24T01:09:21Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.citationArizona Anthropologist #13: pp. 37-56, ©1998 Association of Student Anthropologists, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721en_US
dc.identifier.issn1062-1601
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/110213
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines community reorganization in the Late Natufian period with reference to a general ecological model that links changes in resource scarcity with social reorganization. This model explains why community reorganization should occur in times of subsistence stress, and provides a basis for generating multiple competing hypotheses to explain the nature of that transformation. One hypothesis, that Natufian communities responded to subsistence stress by centralizing land tenure, intensifying subsistence production, and redistributing subsistence goods, is not supported. An alternative hypothesis, that an unequal distribution of land within Natufian communities allowed some segments of the population to endure subsistence stress while forcing others to migrate to more marginal areas, explains more variability in the archaeological record, and withstands preliminary testing with multiple lines of archaeological evidence.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Arizona, Department of Anthropologyen_US
dc.subjectmortuary behavioren_US
dc.subjectNatufian cultureen_US
dc.subjectcommunity organizationen_US
dc.titleMortuary Variability and Community Reorganization in the Early-To-Late Natufian Transitionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalArizona Anthropologisten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-21T19:23:49Z
html.description.abstractThis paper examines community reorganization in the Late Natufian period with reference to a general ecological model that links changes in resource scarcity with social reorganization. This model explains why community reorganization should occur in times of subsistence stress, and provides a basis for generating multiple competing hypotheses to explain the nature of that transformation. One hypothesis, that Natufian communities responded to subsistence stress by centralizing land tenure, intensifying subsistence production, and redistributing subsistence goods, is not supported. An alternative hypothesis, that an unequal distribution of land within Natufian communities allowed some segments of the population to endure subsistence stress while forcing others to migrate to more marginal areas, explains more variability in the archaeological record, and withstands preliminary testing with multiple lines of archaeological evidence.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_gn1_a785_n13_37_56_w-ocr.pdf
Size:
2.382Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record