Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHall, Charles
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, Philip M.
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Gwyneth A.
dc.contributor.authorLee, Debra S.
dc.contributor.authorMcNamara, Danielle S.
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-30T20:22:57Z
dc.date.available2011-03-30T20:22:57Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn0894-4539
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/126392
dc.description.abstractThis study examined differences between the written, national language varieties of the United States and Great Britain, specifically in texts regarding the topic of Law. The few previous studies that have dealt with differences between the dialects of the United States and Great Britain have focused on shallow-level features, such as lexis, subject-verb agreement, and even orthography. In contrast, this study uses the computational tool, Coh-Metrix, to distinguish British from American discourse features within one highly similar genre, Anglo-American legal cases. We conducted a discriminant function analysis along five indices of cohesion on a specially constructed corpus to show those differences in over 400 American and English/Welsh legal cases. Our results suggest substantial differences between the language varieties, casting doubt on previous generalizations about British and American writing that predict that the national varieties would vary more by genre than by language variety. Our results also offer guidance to materials developers of legal English for international purposes (such as in the E.U.) and drafters of international legal documents for producing effective and appropriate materials.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Arizona Linguistics Circle (Tucson, Arizona)en_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://coyotepapers.sbs.arizona.edu/en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.titleUsing Coh-Metrix to assess differences between English language varietiesen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of English, University of Memphisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCEELI Institute, the Czech Republicen_US
dc.identifier.journalCoyote Papersen_US
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Coyote Papers are made available by the Arizona Linguistics Circle at the University of Arizona and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact coyotepapers@email.arizona.edu with questions about these materials.en_US
dc.source.journaltitleCoyote Papers
refterms.dateFOA2018-06-23T15:56:54Z
html.description.abstractThis study examined differences between the written, national language varieties of the United States and Great Britain, specifically in texts regarding the topic of Law. The few previous studies that have dealt with differences between the dialects of the United States and Great Britain have focused on shallow-level features, such as lexis, subject-verb agreement, and even orthography. In contrast, this study uses the computational tool, Coh-Metrix, to distinguish British from American discourse features within one highly similar genre, Anglo-American legal cases. We conducted a discriminant function analysis along five indices of cohesion on a specially constructed corpus to show those differences in over 400 American and English/Welsh legal cases. Our results suggest substantial differences between the language varieties, casting doubt on previous generalizations about British and American writing that predict that the national varieties would vary more by genre than by language variety. Our results also offer guidance to materials developers of legal English for international purposes (such as in the E.U.) and drafters of international legal documents for producing effective and appropriate materials.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_alc_cp_n15_40_54_w.pdf
Size:
117.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record