Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhitley, Sarah Marie
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-28T21:13:29Z
dc.date.available2011-10-28T21:13:29Z
dc.date.issued2011-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/183732
dc.descriptionA Thesis submitted to The University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Medicine.en
dc.description.abstractAccess to healthcare for homeless persons is a significant problem within the United States. However, as barriers are lessened through federally funded or philanthropic organizations, attention must be paid to ensuring quality healthcare. The homeless population has disproportionately high rates of substance abuse, mental health disorders, and traumatic brain injuries. This places these patients at greater risk for lacking capacity to consent. This study was designed to examine the informed consent practices of healthcare practitioners in the primary care setting of clinics having received the federal Healthcare for the Homeless grant. Due to the poor response rate, no data of statistical significance were obtained and the study was treated as a pilot study. Patient demographics closely mirrored national statistics of homelessness excepting ethnicity. Likewise, patients seen in these clinics experience high rates of substance abuse and mental health disease. Providers reported only low rates of traumatic brain injuries in their population, contrary to national statistics demonstrating high rates of this disorder. Despite the high prevalence of risk factors for incapacity to consent, providers rarely questioned their patients’ decisional capacity. Practices involving informed consent varied widely. Further studies need to be conducted to evaluate informed consent practices though it is apparent that studies of this nature may be impractical and unethical, if not impossible.
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the College of Medicine - Phoenix, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subject.meshHomeless Personsen
dc.subject.meshInformed Consenten
dc.titleInformed Consent with Homeless Patientsen_US
dc.typetext; Electronic Thesisen
dc.contributor.departmentThe University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenixen
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item is part of the College of Medicine - Phoenix Scholarly Projects 2011 collection. For more information, contact the Phoenix Biomedical Campus Library at pbc-library@email.arizona.edu.en_US
dc.contributor.mentorRobert, Jasonen
refterms.dateFOA2018-07-14T17:32:29Z
html.description.abstractAccess to healthcare for homeless persons is a significant problem within the United States. However, as barriers are lessened through federally funded or philanthropic organizations, attention must be paid to ensuring quality healthcare. The homeless population has disproportionately high rates of substance abuse, mental health disorders, and traumatic brain injuries. This places these patients at greater risk for lacking capacity to consent. This study was designed to examine the informed consent practices of healthcare practitioners in the primary care setting of clinics having received the federal Healthcare for the Homeless grant. Due to the poor response rate, no data of statistical significance were obtained and the study was treated as a pilot study. Patient demographics closely mirrored national statistics of homelessness excepting ethnicity. Likewise, patients seen in these clinics experience high rates of substance abuse and mental health disease. Providers reported only low rates of traumatic brain injuries in their population, contrary to national statistics demonstrating high rates of this disorder. Despite the high prevalence of risk factors for incapacity to consent, providers rarely questioned their patients’ decisional capacity. Practices involving informed consent varied widely. Further studies need to be conducted to evaluate informed consent practices though it is apparent that studies of this nature may be impractical and unethical, if not impossible.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Whitley_Poster.pdf
Size:
693.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Poster
Thumbnail
Name:
Whitley_Thesis.pdf
Size:
1.606Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Thesis and Poster

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record