Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKing, David A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFLOYD, DONALD WINTERS.
dc.creatorFLOYD, DONALD WINTERS.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-31T16:54:35Z
dc.date.available2011-10-31T16:54:35Z
dc.date.issued1986en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/183950
dc.description.abstractBetween July and September, 1985, 70 ranchers, environmentalists and agency officials participating in three chartered Experimental Stewardship Program (ESP) areas were interviewed. Committee records and agency documents were also examined. As a result of the field work three conclusions were reached: (1) conflicts over grazing decisions have been significantly reduced by the stewardship process, (2) available data is insufficient to support conclusions about changes in the ecological status of the plant communities within the stewardship areas and (3) the annual economic value of rangeland recreation exceeds all other rangeland outputs on all three areas studied.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectRange policy.en_US
dc.subjectRange management.en_US
dc.titleTHE POLICY OF EXPERIMENTAL STEWARDSHIP ON PUBLIC RANGELANDS.en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeDissertation-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
dc.identifier.oclc698244194en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
dc.identifier.proquest8704766en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineRenewable Natural Resourcesen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-22T14:19:08Z
html.description.abstractBetween July and September, 1985, 70 ranchers, environmentalists and agency officials participating in three chartered Experimental Stewardship Program (ESP) areas were interviewed. Committee records and agency documents were also examined. As a result of the field work three conclusions were reached: (1) conflicts over grazing decisions have been significantly reduced by the stewardship process, (2) available data is insufficient to support conclusions about changes in the ecological status of the plant communities within the stewardship areas and (3) the annual economic value of rangeland recreation exceeds all other rangeland outputs on all three areas studied.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_td_8704766_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
3.494Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
azu_td_8704766_sip1_m.pdf

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record