• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    A COMPARISON OF ART PROGRAM EVALUATION RATINGS BY SELF AND VISITING TEAMS IN SELECTED NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION HIGH SCHOOLS (ARIZONA).

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    azu_td_8708567_sip1_m.pdf
    Size:
    3.071Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    azu_td_8708567_sip1_m.pdf
    Download
    Author
    Shahrani, Enayat-Ullah
    Issue Date
    1986
    Advisor
    Barnes, William Donald
    Committee Chair
    Leigh, Howard
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    The University of Arizona.
    Rights
    Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
    Abstract
    The investigation was concerned with 31 Arizona high schools which were members of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools and which had employed the "Evaluative Criteria," 5th Edition to evaluate themselves and which also had a visiting North Central Team evaluation. The study focused on the art section of each school's evaluation. It sought to ascertain differences in ratings between the schools' self-evaluation and the ratings of the visiting North Central Teams on the 31 evaluation items of the Art Section. A theoretical framework of six categories was constructed. This included: Fundamentals, Self-Actualization, Evaluation, Progress, Support, and General Evaluation. Related literature was reviewed for each category to provide a backdrop of concepts with which to consider the collected data. Each of the 31 evaluation items was subsumed under one or another of these categories for systematic study and reporting. The data were analyzed by use of the product-moment correlation coefficient, and the obtained indices of relationship were examined for their significance at the .05 alpha level. A second analysis involving the statistics was applied to the two sets of obtained ratings across the six categories. The factors of school size, i.e., small and large schools, and geographic location, i.e., rural and urban, were also considered statistically. It was found that there was a significant positive set of relationships across the six categories of the theoretical framework between how the schools rated themselves in the art area and how the visiting North Central teams rated the schools in the art area. School size appeared to be a factor in only two of the six categories, i.e., Self-Evaluation and General Evaluation, while geographic location appeared to be a factor in the three categories of Self-Actualization, Evaluation, and Support.
    Type
    text
    Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic)
    Degree Name
    Ph.D.
    Degree Level
    doctoral
    Degree Program
    Teaching and Teacher Education
    Graduate College
    Degree Grantor
    University of Arizona
    Collections
    Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.