KeywordsChina -- Foreign relations -- Korea (South)
China -- Foreign relations -- Korea (North)
China -- Foreign economic relations -- Korea (South)
China -- Economic policy -- 1976-
AdvisorWhiting, Allen S.
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherThe University of Arizona.
RightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
AbstractChina's policy toward the Korean peninsula has shifted from a one-Korea policy to a de facto two-Korea policy. Beijing's constant policy is recognition of Pyongyang as the sole legitimate regime on the peninsula. What Beijing has changed is to acknowledge the existence of the Seoul regime and to inaugurate Sino-South Korean unofficial ties. The main thrust of this research is to examine China's relations with South Korea and North Korea during the period between 1984 and 1989 and to identify the national interests which made Beijing leaders shift their Korea policy. The hypothesis of this study is: China's economic priority is the determining factor and changes in the international environment in East Asia are a contributing factor which made China incrementally shift policy toward the Korean peninsula. The decision to adopt the policy of "revitalizing the economy internally and implementing the open door policy externally" in the Third Plenum of the Eleventh Chinese Communist Party Central Committee in 1978 resulted in revolutionary changes in Chinese foreign policy. These changes resulted from new foreign policy orientations, namely, pragmatism, the growing magnitude of economic elements, open door policy, and entente diplomacy. These new orientations were able to be applied to the Korean case when changes in the Northeast Asian international milieu provided chances in the early 1980s. These changes were the growing positive Sino-Soviet relations, the emergence of South Korea as an economic power, the improvement of Soviet-North Korean relations, and the failure of North Korean diplomacy. Through empirical studies of Chinese foreign behavior and official media, the hypothesis is proven valid. In the early 1980s, China evidently changed its Korean policy priority from strategic interests to political interests with a desire for a peaceful international environment. The growing unofficial Beijing-Seoul contacts show that China desires to pursue its economic interests in South Korea but under the premise of not jeopardizing its relations with North Korea. This line will not change until North Korea is willing to accept cross-recognition.
Degree ProgramEast Asian Studies
Degree GrantorUniversity of Arizona
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
The China Plus One Strategy: A Signal of the Next Step of China's Economic DevelopmentNellan, Amrietha (The University of Arizona., 2010-05)China's economic growth over the past two decades has been a point of envy for developed and developing countries alike. China has been able to achieve this due to the policy focus of their government on trade liberalization and capturing foreign investment. This involvement by the government in aiding the national economy move up the technology ladder has been quite successful in stabilizing such rapid growth. However, recent government policies have instigated a new direction of the Chinese economy away from low-end manufacturing and more into high-end manufacturing and services, called the 'China plus one strategy'. This new direction initially showed no signs of problems for China's growth goals; however, the Financial Crisis was the final push causing a mass decline of low-end manufacturers in China. The resulting unemployment issue across urban and rural China has shown a significant weakness in the Chinese economy, namely that too many jobs are dependent on foreign consumer demand. Thus, China's future economic development will take on a new face of cultivating domestic consumption to support and stabilize jobs and strategic government initiatives like the 'China plus one strategy'.
China's One Child Policy and Male Surplus as a Source of Demand for Sex Trafficking to ChinaHall, Andrew Thomas (The University of Arizona., 2010-05)The Chinese government cites the country's controversial One Child Policy as a key factor in China's economic rise over the last few decades. Lower birth rates, they argue, correlate to more rapid development. However, in a society with a deeply-rooted preference for sons, the policy has caused an unforeseen uptake in female infanticide and feticide, translating to a drastic imbalance in sex ratios in Chinese demography, particularly among under-20 Chinese. With some 40 million men unable to find wives by 2020, China faces an unprecedented demographic problem. One of the most devastating effects of the One Child Policy and sex ratio imbalance is a sharp uptake in demand for sex trafficking to China, particularly forced prostitution and trafficking for marriage. More sex trafficking in China may spell disaster not only for hundreds of thousands of women and girls trafficked for sex, but also for Chinese society at large--sex trafficking accelerates the spread of HIV and compromises national security as borders become more porous and organized crime becomes more ubiquitous. The Chinese government, the US government, inter-governmental organizations like the UN and ASEAN, and non-governmental organizations each have specific roles to play in curbing the flow of sex trafficking in China.