• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    APPLICATION OF LATENT STRUCTURE ANALYSIS TO THE REITAN-INDIANA APHASIA SCREENING TEST.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    azu_td_8311421_sip1_m.pdf
    Size:
    2.425Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    azu_td_8311421_sip1_m.pdf
    Download
    Author
    VAN DE VOORDE, JANET STEELE.
    Issue Date
    1983
    Keywords
    Aphasia -- Diagnosis.
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    The University of Arizona.
    Rights
    Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
    Abstract
    The Reitan-Indiana Aphasia Screening Test was examined using a latent structure analysis which involved the assumptions that a latent variable X (brain function), could explain the relationships among the manifest variables A, B, C, D (categories of responses to the Aphasia Test). It was further assumed that within the latent variable a four-class model would be the preferred model. And, it was assumed that persons clinically assigned to the latent classes would be similarly assigned by their test responses. The model was represented by mathematical equations which express the probability of a given response pattern in a contingency table in terms of the joint probabilities of each latent class and the response pattern. Chi-square values were obtained for the model of independence, for the four-class model, for the three-class model and for two two-class models. Hierarchical subtractions were made which resulted in a preferred model, leaving a Chi-square value to be referred to the Chi-square distribution to determine whether or not the latent class model offered an improvement of fit to the data. Twelve comparisons were made using different item combinations. All 12 showed the four-class model offered a significant improvement over the model of independence and either of two two-class models tested. Eleven of the twelve comparisons showed that a four-class model provided an adequate fit to the data. In seven of those instances the four-class model was accepted as the preferred model. In the remaining four instances the heirarchical subtractions showed that a four-class model did not offer significant improvement over the three-class model, so the three-class model was accepted as the preferred model due to the criterion of parsimony. The study showed that there are four categories of brain function which can be identified by means of a behavioral test. It also gave the exact coefficient of agreement between assignment of individuals into those categories by clinical and test classification. It was concluded that latent structure analysis is an effective technique to describe brain-behavior relationships. It was further suggested that consideration be given to the use of latent trait statistics to continue to refine the Aphasia Test without compromising the extensive results already achieved.
    Type
    text
    Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic)
    Degree Name
    Ph.D.
    Degree Level
    doctoral
    Degree Program
    Educational Psychology
    Graduate College
    Degree Grantor
    University of Arizona
    Collections
    Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.