Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBowers, Jeffrey Scott.
dc.creatorBowers, Jeffrey Scott.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-31T18:02:14Z
dc.date.available2011-10-31T18:02:14Z
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/186214
dc.description.abstractA series of 5 experiments assessed implicit and explicit memory for words and nonwords. Experiments 1-2 assessed memory for words and legal nonwords (e.g. KERS) following a levels-of-processing manipulation and a study/test modality shift manipulation, respectively. Robust priming was observed for words and nonwords in both experiments, and an implicit/explicit dissociation was observed for nonwords in Experiment 1. Experiment 3 observed a double dissociation between implicit and explicit memory for words and legal nonwords following a study condition that confounded the above levels-of-processing and study/test modality shift manipulations. Experiment 4 observed robust priming for legal and illegal nonwords (e.g., XYKS) that dissociated from explicit memory following a levels-of-processing manipulation. Finally, Experiment observed significant negative priming for legal nonwords when the lexical decision task was used. These experiments suggest that implicit memory can extend to legal and illegal nonwords.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectDissertations, Academic.en_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Experimental.en_US
dc.subjectPsychology -- Research.en_US
dc.titlePriming of nonwords in normal subjects.en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeDissertation-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
dc.contributor.chairForster, Kenneth I.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc716215550en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberGlisky, Elizabeth L.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberIttelson, William H.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKihlstrom, John F.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberNadel, Lynnen_US
dc.identifier.proquest9322725en_US
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychologyen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-23T11:11:00Z
html.description.abstractA series of 5 experiments assessed implicit and explicit memory for words and nonwords. Experiments 1-2 assessed memory for words and legal nonwords (e.g. KERS) following a levels-of-processing manipulation and a study/test modality shift manipulation, respectively. Robust priming was observed for words and nonwords in both experiments, and an implicit/explicit dissociation was observed for nonwords in Experiment 1. Experiment 3 observed a double dissociation between implicit and explicit memory for words and legal nonwords following a study condition that confounded the above levels-of-processing and study/test modality shift manipulations. Experiment 4 observed robust priming for legal and illegal nonwords (e.g., XYKS) that dissociated from explicit memory following a levels-of-processing manipulation. Finally, Experiment observed significant negative priming for legal nonwords when the lexical decision task was used. These experiments suggest that implicit memory can extend to legal and illegal nonwords.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_td_9322725_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
4.265Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
azu_td_9322725_sip1_m.pdf

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record