NEMO Watershed-Based Plan Bill Williams Watershed
Name:
BillWilliams.pdf
Size:
3.159Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Bill Williams Watershed Based Plan
Name:
bw_reference_map_small.pdf
Size:
6.352Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Location Map (small pdf)
Name:
bw_reference_small.jpg
Size:
516.0Kb
Format:
JPEG image
Description:
Location Map (small jpg)
Description
Section 1: Introduction, Section 2: Physical Features, Section 3: Biological Resources, Section 4: Social/Economic, Section 5: Important Resources, Section 6: Watershed Classification, Section 7: Watershed Management, Section 8: Watershed Planning, Appendix A: Water Quality Data and Assessments, Appendix B: Selected References, Appendix C: RUSLE, Appendix D: AGWACollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Arizona Watershed Stewardship Guide: Life in the Watershed -- Part I: Watershed Ecology(College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2005)Arizona Watershed Stewardship Guide was created to help individuals and groups build a mutual foundation of basic knowledge about watersheds in Arizona. It is intended to help Arizonans understand and be good stewards of their watersheds. The guide was designed to compliment the mission of Arizona Master Watershed Steward program to educate and train citizens across the state of Arizona to serve as volunteers in the monitoring, restoration, conservation, and protection of their water and watersheds. The guide consists of 10 self-contained modules which teach about one or more important aspects of watershed science or management.
-
NEMO Watershed-Based Plan Salt Watershed(2008-08)
-
The effects of watershed treatments on the relationship between runoff peak and volume for the Beaver Creek watershed, Arizona(The University of Arizona., 1990)The relationship between runoff peak and volume was examined for ten sub-watersheds in the Beaver Creek, Arizona watershed. Least square analyses, linear regression, and coefficient analysis were utilized to evaluate the effects of treatments. Different treatments, such as clear cutting, uprooting, herbicide, and thinning, were applied on watersheds. For most of the watersheds, treatments were shown to have no significant effect on the relationship. However, herbicide treatment and clear cutting treatment in watersheds 3 and 12 respectively showed highly significant increases in peak flows. Significant increase in peak for the smaller events resulted from scattered patch cutting in watershed #10.
