Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFawkes, Donald Arthur.
dc.creatorFawkes, Donald Arthur.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-31T18:12:33Z
dc.date.available2011-10-31T18:12:33Z
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/186558
dc.description.abstractChapter 1 employs an analysis of the ad hoc to argue that there are cognitive grounds (grounds properly and reasonably connected with knowledge) for choice between empirically equivalent alternative physical theories, and that there are cognitive grounds for theory transition, like the transition from ether theory to relativity theory. Chapter 2 examines the indefinitely large class of empirically equivalent alternatives to standard General Relativity Theory (GTR), and argues that there are cognitive grounds that favor standard GTR. Chapter 3 describes two fairly recent attempts to resolve the problem of an indefinitely large class of empirically equivalent alternatives to standard GTR, posed in chapter 2, and argues that these recent attempts fail. Chapter 4 examines and argues for an epistemological principle employed in chapter 1, and then concludes with a summary of some general consequences for the philosophy of science posed by this study.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.titleCognitive grounds for choice among equally well confirmed alternative physical theories.en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeDissertation-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
dc.contributor.chairByerly, Henry C.en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberCowan, Joseph L.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberLehrer, Keithen_US
dc.identifier.proquest9421764en_US
thesis.degree.disciplinePhilosophyen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-05-29T16:14:35Z
html.description.abstractChapter 1 employs an analysis of the ad hoc to argue that there are cognitive grounds (grounds properly and reasonably connected with knowledge) for choice between empirically equivalent alternative physical theories, and that there are cognitive grounds for theory transition, like the transition from ether theory to relativity theory. Chapter 2 examines the indefinitely large class of empirically equivalent alternatives to standard General Relativity Theory (GTR), and argues that there are cognitive grounds that favor standard GTR. Chapter 3 describes two fairly recent attempts to resolve the problem of an indefinitely large class of empirically equivalent alternatives to standard GTR, posed in chapter 2, and argues that these recent attempts fail. Chapter 4 examines and argues for an epistemological principle employed in chapter 1, and then concludes with a summary of some general consequences for the philosophy of science posed by this study.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_td_9421764_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
4.943Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
azu_td_9421764_sip1_m.pdf

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record