Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGersten, Elizabeth Welliver
dc.creatorGersten, Elizabeth Welliveren_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-31T18:27:11Z
dc.date.available2011-10-31T18:27:11Z
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/187031
dc.description.abstractThis multitrait-multimethod study explored the ability of three methods to separate the two constructs of anxiety and depression. Methods used were true-false (Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale and Multiscore Depression Inventory), adjective check lists (Multiple Affect Adjective Check List and Depression Adjective Check List), and 5-point rating scales (Positive Affect and Negative Affect scales of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule). Participants were 148 community college students of diverse ethnic background from a large southwestern city. Convergent validity was evident by moderate monotrait-multimethod correlations (.61, .62, and .78 for anxiety and .56, .52, and .49 for depression). The Positive Affect scale, representing the absence of depression, correlated negatively with all other scales, as expected. Correlation coefficients were reflected to remove the negative sign. Discriminant validity was comprised when many of the multitrait-multimethod correlations (ranging from .23 to .70) were higher than the monotrait-multimethod correlations and by the consistent strength of the strength of the multitrait-monomethod correlations (.75, .48, and .37). The contribution of method to the correlations was demonstrated by large differences between multitrait-monomethod and multitrait-multimethod correlations.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.titleMultitrait-multimethod assessment of anxiety and depression scales.en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeDissertation-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
dc.contributor.chairSabers, Darrellen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMishra, Shitala P.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberAleamoni, Lawrence M.en_US
dc.identifier.proquest9527993en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineEducational Psychologyen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-06-30T01:54:02Z
html.description.abstractThis multitrait-multimethod study explored the ability of three methods to separate the two constructs of anxiety and depression. Methods used were true-false (Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale and Multiscore Depression Inventory), adjective check lists (Multiple Affect Adjective Check List and Depression Adjective Check List), and 5-point rating scales (Positive Affect and Negative Affect scales of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule). Participants were 148 community college students of diverse ethnic background from a large southwestern city. Convergent validity was evident by moderate monotrait-multimethod correlations (.61, .62, and .78 for anxiety and .56, .52, and .49 for depression). The Positive Affect scale, representing the absence of depression, correlated negatively with all other scales, as expected. Correlation coefficients were reflected to remove the negative sign. Discriminant validity was comprised when many of the multitrait-multimethod correlations (ranging from .23 to .70) were higher than the monotrait-multimethod correlations and by the consistent strength of the strength of the multitrait-monomethod correlations (.75, .48, and .37). The contribution of method to the correlations was demonstrated by large differences between multitrait-monomethod and multitrait-multimethod correlations.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_td_9527993_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
2.814Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
azu_td_9527993_sip1_m.pdf

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record