Perceptions of skill importance ratings for performance appraisal: Contextual effects by organization and by job classification.
Name:
azu_td_9531086_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
2.088Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
azu_td_9531086_sip1_m.pdf
Author
Smith, William Leverne.Issue Date
1995Committee Chair
Tansik, David A.
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
The University of Arizona.Rights
Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.Abstract
This dissertation reports the results of two studies conducted to determine whether perceptions of incumbents would vary across five job classifications in two hospitals on six skill importance categories. 172 subjects distributed 100 points across the importance categories in accordance with their perceptions of "what it takes to do a good job." Significant differences were found across job classifications and organizations. A second study of 30 nurses found they were able to recognize their weightings on the skill importance categories when presented in a performance appraisal setting and rejected equal weighting and inverse weighting options. Future research implications are discussed.Type
textDissertation-Reproduction (electronic)
Degree Name
Ph.D.Degree Level
doctoralDegree Program
Business AdministrationGraduate College