An architectural programming toolbox: Using Group Support Systems technology to increase the effectiveness of user participation in architectural programming.
dc.contributor.author | Mittleman, Daniel David. | |
dc.creator | Mittleman, Daniel David. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-10-31T18:30:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-10-31T18:30:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1995 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187131 | |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation explores the use of Group Support Systems (GSS) to overcome operational bottlenecks in the architectural programming process which constrain user participation. To this end, both architectural programming and GSS literature are reviewed. A model is derived to support the use of GSS in architectural programming and a toolbox of GSS tools is established and validated. Within the toolbox, one new tool, GroupProgrammer, is designed, coded and validated. Three case studies are then undertaken to validate the GSS model. The case studies demonstrate a potential for GSS to balance participation in architectural programming worksessions as well as increase the overall amount of information collected. Nineteen lessons learned and four critical success factors are presented from the case studies. Five potential future directions for this research stream, both for MIS and for architecture are explored. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | The University of Arizona. | en_US |
dc.rights | Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. | en_US |
dc.title | An architectural programming toolbox: Using Group Support Systems technology to increase the effectiveness of user participation in architectural programming. | en_US |
dc.type | text | en_US |
dc.type | Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) | en_US |
dc.contributor.chair | Nunamaker, Jay F. Jr. | en_US |
thesis.degree.grantor | University of Arizona | en_US |
thesis.degree.level | doctoral | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Vogel, Douglas R. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Pendergast, Mark | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Herschberger, Robert | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Doxtater, Dennis | en_US |
dc.identifier.proquest | 9531149 | en_US |
thesis.degree.discipline | Business Administration | en_US |
thesis.degree.discipline | Graduate College | en_US |
thesis.degree.name | Ph.D. | en_US |
dc.description.note | This item was digitized from a paper original and/or a microfilm copy. If you need higher-resolution images for any content in this item, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu. | |
dc.description.admin-note | Original file replaced with corrected file November 2023. | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-07-18T00:58:58Z | |
html.description.abstract | This dissertation explores the use of Group Support Systems (GSS) to overcome operational bottlenecks in the architectural programming process which constrain user participation. To this end, both architectural programming and GSS literature are reviewed. A model is derived to support the use of GSS in architectural programming and a toolbox of GSS tools is established and validated. Within the toolbox, one new tool, GroupProgrammer, is designed, coded and validated. Three case studies are then undertaken to validate the GSS model. The case studies demonstrate a potential for GSS to balance participation in architectural programming worksessions as well as increase the overall amount of information collected. Nineteen lessons learned and four critical success factors are presented from the case studies. Five potential future directions for this research stream, both for MIS and for architecture are explored. |