ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION EFFECTS ON PERCEPTION OF RECREATIONAL AND SCENIC QUALITIES OF FOREST BURN AREAS.
AuthorTAYLOR, JONATHAN GOLDING.
KeywordsForest fires -- Prevention and control -- Psychological aspects.
Forests and forestry -- Arizona -- Recreational use -- Psychological aspects.
Fire ecology -- Arizona -- Psychological aspects.
Prescribed burning -- Psychological aspects.
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherThe University of Arizona.
RightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
AbstractThe purpose of this study has been to test public perceptions of both scenic quality and recreational acceptability of southwestern ponderosa pine forests exibiting one-to-five years of recovery from both light and severe fire. Public fire-effects information documents were also constructed and tested. Appropriate ponderosa forest areas in Arizona were selected and randomly photographed. Population samples, drawn from Tucson, Arizona, first read fire-ecology or "control" information brochures and then rated forest scenes on 1-to-10 scales for scenic quality and for acceptability for selected forms of outdoor recreation. Respondents finally answered a short fire-knowledge, fire-attitude questionnaire. Ratings were subjected to SBE analysis (Daniel and Boster, 1976), and analysis of variance was applied to both ratings and questionnaire results. The clearest distinction drawn, for both scenic quality and recreational acceptability, is between light-fire and severe-fire effects. Light fire improves scenic quality for a 3-to-4 year period, while severe fire seriously detracts from scenic quality for an unknown length of time exceeding the 5-year period tested. Recreational acceptability is differentiated according to the recreational activity selected: camping is nearly twice as sensitive to severe fire effects as scenic quality, and is somewhat disrupted by light fire effects; picnicking is second-most impacted by severe fire effects; hiking or backpacking is affected by severe fire to about the same degree as scenic quality; nature study is least affected. Picnicking, hiking and nature study are not significantly affected by light fire. Provision of fire-effects information does not significantly affect scenic or recreational evaluation of forest burn areas. The fire-effects information brochures produced general "halo" effects on both fire knowledge and fire attitude in the groups sampled. Fire knowledge shifted toward the expert position that fire effects are less severe than generally believed. Fire attitude shifted toward the expert position of greater tolerance for fire in ponderosa ecosystems. Results show prescribed burning as generally acceptable. The results of this study demonstrate distinctions between affect (perceptual evaluations) and cognition (questionnaire response). Scenic and recreational evaluations emerge as clearly distinct entities.
Degree ProgramRenewable Natural Resources
Degree GrantorUniversity of Arizona
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Life on hold: A theory of spouse response to the waiting period prior to heart transplantation.Murdaugh, Carolyn; Williams, Mary.; Phillips, Linda R.; Verran, Joyce A.; Hirschi, Travis; Snow, David A. (The University of Arizona., 1991)The purpose of this study was to generate a grounded theory explaining the social and psychological processes used by spouses during the waiting period prior to heart transplantation. Theory discovery was accomplished using the grounded theory methodology. Life on Hold was identified as the basic social psychological process generated from the data that explains the responses of spouses during the waiting period prior to heart transplantation. Life on Hold is the process of "tabling" life's activities for an indefinite period of time in order to devote one's life to another person(s) or event. Spouses of heart transplant candidates set aside life's activities and focus all thoughts, actions, and energy on maintaining the life of the candidate until a donor heart is obtained. The process consists of two stages: Freeing Self and Making Life the Transplant. The theory provides a basis for the development of relevant interventions to assist family members to cope with the uncertainty and stress of the transplant experience.
Cognitive response to symptoms in women with rheumatoid arthritis.Braden, Carrie Jo; McNamara, Anne Margaret.; Ferketich, Sandra; Woodtli, Anne; Figueredo, Aurelio; Sechrest, Lee (The University of Arizona., 1992)The purpose of this study was to advance knowledge and understanding related to the cognitive response evoked by symptoms in women with rheumatoid arthritis. The mechanisms to achieve this purpose were through: (1) psychometric evaluation of a newly developed instrument: Chronic Fatigue Index (CFI), (2) examining the relationship among the symptoms of RA and components of quality of life for women with RA, and (3) exploring the mechanism by which learned resourcefulness affects the relationship between symptoms and quality of life. The Chronic Fatigue Index (CFI) was evaluated and met minimal levels of reliability and validity. Cronbach alpha reliability estimate for the CFI was.87. Convergent validity was tested through factor analysis. The CFI was found to be a multi-dimensional scale with two distinct factors: chronicity and interference. The factor analytical strategies revealed 46% of the variance in chronic fatigue was supported by these two components. Moderate to strong relationships were found among the symptoms of chronic pain, chronic fatigue, disturbed sleep, and disease flare. To evaluate quality of life in this population a common factor was created through factor analysis. The results of factor analysis revealed three indicators explaining 69% of the variance in quality of life for this population. Chronic pain explained fourteen percent of the variance in learned resourcefulness. The other symptoms and multiplicative terms did not meet the entry criteria. Learned resourcefulness was a weak mediator between the disturbance of chronic pain and quality of life, but successfully moderated the adverse effect of disturbed sleep. Fifty eight percent of the variance in quality of life was explained by the direct path of chronic pain and disturbed sleep on quality of life and the interaction of disturbed sleep and learned resourcefulness. Model respecification suggested that the inclusion of additional variables in the model would increase the explanatory power of the model. The self-regulation framework for symptom appraisal was supported by the findings of this study. Nursing interventions should focus on assisting clients with enhancing their level of learned resourcefulness as it will buffer the adverse effects of the disease process.