Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRebuck, Ernest Charles,1944-
dc.creatorRebuck, Ernest Charles,1944-en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-28T13:22:33Z
dc.date.available2011-11-28T13:22:33Z
dc.date.issued1972en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/190992
dc.description.abstractA finite difference model was developed specifically for analyzing the Grand Island, Nebraska aquifer test. Time-drawdown data for the aquifer test were fitted by least squares to an exponential type equation. To facilitate calibration of the model, interpolated distance-drawdown profiles also were fitted to an exponential type equation. The treatment of aquifer boundaries and the assumption of isotropic aquifer conditions affected the model computed water table profile. The effect was significant enough as to defy making accurate estimates of saturated hydraulic conductivity and specific yield. When the analysis was extended to long time periods of discharge, problems with the boundaries, particularly the distance to the lateral constant head boundary, led to unrealistic estimates of pumping level. The finite difference technique has its greatest application as a research method for analyzing short-duration aquifer tests provided that the aquifer conditions are well defined, measurements of pumping level are available and drawdown measurements have been secured for at least two observation wells within close proximity of the discharge well. Because of difficulties in maintaining convergence and model stability, the finite difference model reviewed in this study is too cumbersome to be considered a practical, field method for the analysis of unconfined aquifer parameters.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectHydrology.en_US
dc.subjectGroundwater -- Nebraska -- Grand Island.en_US
dc.subjectGroundwater -- Mathematical models.en_US
dc.titleEvaluation of unconfined aquifer parameters using a successive line relaxation finite difference model.en_US
dc.typeDissertation-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.contributor.chairMatlock, William G.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc213091680en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberEvans, Daniel D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberFangmeier, Delmar D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWarrick, Arthur W.en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineHydrology and Water Resourcesen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en_US
dc.description.notehydrology collectionen_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-24T07:22:01Z
html.description.abstractA finite difference model was developed specifically for analyzing the Grand Island, Nebraska aquifer test. Time-drawdown data for the aquifer test were fitted by least squares to an exponential type equation. To facilitate calibration of the model, interpolated distance-drawdown profiles also were fitted to an exponential type equation. The treatment of aquifer boundaries and the assumption of isotropic aquifer conditions affected the model computed water table profile. The effect was significant enough as to defy making accurate estimates of saturated hydraulic conductivity and specific yield. When the analysis was extended to long time periods of discharge, problems with the boundaries, particularly the distance to the lateral constant head boundary, led to unrealistic estimates of pumping level. The finite difference technique has its greatest application as a research method for analyzing short-duration aquifer tests provided that the aquifer conditions are well defined, measurements of pumping level are available and drawdown measurements have been secured for at least two observation wells within close proximity of the discharge well. Because of difficulties in maintaining convergence and model stability, the finite difference model reviewed in this study is too cumbersome to be considered a practical, field method for the analysis of unconfined aquifer parameters.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_td_hy_e9791_1972_8_sip1_w.pdf
Size:
7.747Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
azu_td_hy_e9791_1972_8_sip1_w.pdf

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record