The UA Campus Repository is experiencing systematic automated, high-volume traffic (bots). Temporary mitigation measures to address bot traffic have been put in place; however, this has resulted in restrictions on searching WITHIN collections or using sidebar filters WITHIN collections. You can still Browse by Title/Author/Year WITHIN collections. Also, you can still search at the top level of the repository (use the search box at the top of every page) and apply filters from that search level. Export of search results has also been restricted at this time. Please contact us at any time for assistance - email repository@u.library.arizona.edu.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Marc Gabriel,1947-
dc.creatorKaplan, Marc Gabriel,1947-en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-28T13:55:54Zen
dc.date.available2011-11-28T13:55:54Zen
dc.date.issued1973en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/191471en
dc.description.abstractAn infiltration-wetting agent study, using the wetting agent "WATER-IN", was conducted in the ponderosa pine forest type of east central Arizona, near McNary, Arizona. An application rate of 10 gallons of wetting agent per surface acre was used both on bare mineral soil and on ponderosa pine litter. The infiltration rate was measured by a modified North Fork infiltrometer. It was found that "WATER-IN" significantly increased water runoff, when applied to litter, but when applied to bare mineral soil, "WATER-IN" caused a significant increase in water infiltration. The wetting agent did not significantly affect antecedent moisture, soil particle distribution, litter water holding capacity, or litter bulk density. It is presently hypothesized that the increase in water infiltration on treated bare mineral soil is due to a decrease in the average bulk density of the surface inch of soil. The data strongly suggests this hypothesis to be correct. The increase in runoff when litter is treated is probably due to an interaction, either physical, chemical, or both, between the humus layer and "WATER-IN", creating a hydrophobic condition where one did not exist before.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectHydrology.en_US
dc.subjectSoil absorption and adsorption.en_US
dc.subjectForest management.en_US
dc.subjectSurface active agents.en_US
dc.subjectPonderosa pine -- Ecology.en_US
dc.titleChanges in water infiltration capacities following the application of a wetting agent on a ponderosa pine forest flooren_US
dc.typeThesis-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.contributor.chairZwolinski, Malcolm J.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc213096542en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.levelmastersen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineWatershed Managementen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en_US
dc.description.notehydrology collectionen_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-24T10:30:04Z
html.description.abstractAn infiltration-wetting agent study, using the wetting agent "WATER-IN", was conducted in the ponderosa pine forest type of east central Arizona, near McNary, Arizona. An application rate of 10 gallons of wetting agent per surface acre was used both on bare mineral soil and on ponderosa pine litter. The infiltration rate was measured by a modified North Fork infiltrometer. It was found that "WATER-IN" significantly increased water runoff, when applied to litter, but when applied to bare mineral soil, "WATER-IN" caused a significant increase in water infiltration. The wetting agent did not significantly affect antecedent moisture, soil particle distribution, litter water holding capacity, or litter bulk density. It is presently hypothesized that the increase in water infiltration on treated bare mineral soil is due to a decrease in the average bulk density of the surface inch of soil. The data strongly suggests this hypothesis to be correct. The increase in runoff when litter is treated is probably due to an interaction, either physical, chemical, or both, between the humus layer and "WATER-IN", creating a hydrophobic condition where one did not exist before.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_td_hy_e9791_1973_25_sip1_w.pdf
Size:
1.839Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record