An economic analysis of crop-water production functions : California
Corn -- Irrigation -- Economic aspects.
Cotton -- Irrigation -- Economic aspects.
Tomatoes -- Irrigation -- Economic aspects.
Irrigation farming -- Economic aspects -- California.
Committee ChairAyer, Harry W.
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherThe University of Arizona.
RightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
AbstractWater conservation has become an increasingly important issue in much of the arid West and in California in particular. Governmental agencies are interested in instituting policies which will help conserve water (reduce water application levels on a per acre basis). Some of the policies include water pricing, tax credits and/or subsidies for improving field and irrigation delivery efficiencies, reductions in available irrigation water and use of the extension service as a means of conveying water-saving techniques and technologies to farmers. The effects of the above policies on farmer profits, returns over total variable costs and quantities of water conserved are examined for three crops grown in California - corn, cotton, and processing tomatoes. The results show that there is potential for conserving water in California through implementation of governmental policies. Water pricing policies could be effective on all crops if the price changes are dramatic rather than marginal. Improvements in field and delivery efficiencies for furrow irrigated crops could conserve water and improve farmers' returns over total variable costs. Improving field efficiencies for sprinkler irrigated crops could conserve some water, but farmers returns over total variable costs are only marginally improved. Reductions in available water will clearly conserve water. The effects on farmer profits, however, vary with the type of crop, type of irrigation and location of the farm. Using the extension service to encourage farmers to irrigate at profit maximizing levels rather than at the levels currently being used could conserve water and marginally improve profits.
Degree ProgramAgricultural Economics
Degree GrantorUniversity of Arizona
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Economic analysis of biofuels production in arid regionsRuskin, Helen Ann Kassander.; Pingry, David; Johnson, J. D.; Evans, Daniel D.; Frank, Helmut; Cory, Dennis (The University of Arizona., 1983)The objective of this study is to develop a model to evaluate the economic feasibility of biofuels production, and in particular to isolate the variables crucial to feasibility. The model constructed to define these variables is unique in its ability to accommodate a variety of plants and to integrate all portions of the production process; it was tested on a case study of a Euphorbia lathyris industry. The model minimizes costs of production to determine the best configuration for the industry. Total cost equals the sum of costs incurred in each segment of the process: growth, harvest, transport, and extraction. The solution is determined through a non-linear transportation- transshipment algorithm which describes production as a series of nodes and links. Specific application of the model was analysis of E. lathyris biofuel production in Arizona. Simulations were run examining the sensitivity of biocrude cost to changes in input parameters. Conclusions are summarized as follows. * No change in any single element can reduce final cost sufficiently to enable competitive production in the near future. * The major factor necessary to bring cost into range is improvement in biological yield. Two components of equal importance are tonnage produced per acre and percentage extractables recovered in processing. * Lowering cropping costs provided the most effective improvements of economic inputs. Perennial crops significantly reduced farm costs. * Transportation costs outweighed economies of scale in extraction; extractor location close to crops is more efficient than centralized. The cost minimization model was successfully used to isolate the critical factors for an E. lathyris industry in an arid region. Results determine that this industry would not be competitive in Arizona without dramatic improvements in yields and moderate changes in a combination of input costs. Viability is critically dependent on improvements in tonnage yield produced per acre and percent extractables recovered.