Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSoule, Ann Catherine.
dc.creatorSoule, Ann Catherine.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-28T14:15:12Z
dc.date.available2011-11-28T14:15:12Z
dc.date.issued1990en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/192047
dc.description.abstractGeneral dissatisfaction with the outcome of many wetland mitigation projects pursuant to Clean Water Act §404 permitting has caused environmentalists, regulators, and proponents of development to press for better information to guide project planning, technical design, regulation, and construction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the priorities and practices of different participants in wetland creation and restoration in the Pacific Northwest. The research instrument was a survey, developed and conducted in 1988-89. The analysis focused on planners of wetland projects (usually, but not always, mitigation projects) and reviewers of wetland permit applications and mitigation plans, and resulted in four types of major findings: areas where particular participants are sometimes under-informed, new information not included in the literature, areas where different participants have conflicting ideas, and directions for further research. Several policy recommendations are aimed at improving the chances of achievement of wetland mitigation goals.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectHydrology.
dc.subjectWetland conservation -- Planning.
dc.subjectEnvironmental policy -- Evaluation.
dc.subjectWetlands -- Law and legislation.
dc.subjectEnvironmental monitoring -- Evaluation.
dc.titleDeficiencies in wetland project planning, review and implementationen_US
dc.typeThesis-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.contributor.chairLord, William B.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc213332895en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.levelmastersen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineHydrology and Water Resourcesen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.nameM.S.en_US
dc.description.notehydrology collectionen_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-04-25T23:19:11Z
html.description.abstractGeneral dissatisfaction with the outcome of many wetland mitigation projects pursuant to Clean Water Act §404 permitting has caused environmentalists, regulators, and proponents of development to press for better information to guide project planning, technical design, regulation, and construction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the priorities and practices of different participants in wetland creation and restoration in the Pacific Northwest. The research instrument was a survey, developed and conducted in 1988-89. The analysis focused on planners of wetland projects (usually, but not always, mitigation projects) and reviewers of wetland permit applications and mitigation plans, and resulted in four types of major findings: areas where particular participants are sometimes under-informed, new information not included in the literature, areas where different participants have conflicting ideas, and directions for further research. Several policy recommendations are aimed at improving the chances of achievement of wetland mitigation goals.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_td_hy_e9791_1990_637_sip1_w.pdf
Size:
6.840Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
azu_td_hy_e9791_1990_637_sip1_w.pdf

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record