Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWeinzettle, Christina
dc.creatorWeinzettle, Christinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-05T14:11:39Z
dc.date.available2011-12-05T14:11:39Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/193254
dc.description.abstractThe Theory of Regulation and the Economic Theory of Regulatory Constraint have not yet been adapted by American Indian Studies scholars to explain and analyze the federal regulations connected with Federal Indian Law and Policy. It is the intention of this thesis to prove the applicability of these theories to the law and policy concentration of American Indian Studies. The adaptation of these two theories could impact how federal regulations affecting Indian Country are viewed and interpreted. An examination of Federal Indian policy, specifically the regulations (43 CFR 10) promulgated for the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 tribal consultation processes (36 CFR PART 800) can provide a case study for understanding the applicability of the Theory of Regulation and the Economic Theory of Regulatory Constraint to a common regulatory process in Federal Indian Law.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectAISen_US
dc.subjectAIS Theoryen_US
dc.subjectAmerican Indian Studiesen_US
dc.subjectFederal Indian Law and Policyen_US
dc.subjectRegulatory Models for AISen_US
dc.subjectRegulatory Theoryen_US
dc.titleProving the Applicability of the Theory of Regulation and the Economic Theory of Regulatory Constraint to American Indian Studies (AIS): A Case Study in Federal Indian Law and Policyen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeElectronic Thesisen_US
dc.contributor.chairLuna-Firebaugh, Eileenen_US
dc.identifier.oclc659754991en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.levelmastersen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberFerguson, T.J.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberTippeconnic Fox, Mary Joen_US
dc.identifier.proquest11040en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineAmerican Indian Studiesen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.nameM.A.en_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-05-28T08:06:36Z
html.description.abstractThe Theory of Regulation and the Economic Theory of Regulatory Constraint have not yet been adapted by American Indian Studies scholars to explain and analyze the federal regulations connected with Federal Indian Law and Policy. It is the intention of this thesis to prove the applicability of these theories to the law and policy concentration of American Indian Studies. The adaptation of these two theories could impact how federal regulations affecting Indian Country are viewed and interpreted. An examination of Federal Indian policy, specifically the regulations (43 CFR 10) promulgated for the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 tribal consultation processes (36 CFR PART 800) can provide a case study for understanding the applicability of the Theory of Regulation and the Economic Theory of Regulatory Constraint to a common regulatory process in Federal Indian Law.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_etd_11040_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
750.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
azu_etd_11040_sip1_m.pdf

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record