Transformation of Preservice and New Teacher Literacy Identity: Three Transactional Dimensions
AuthorSpitler, Ellen J.
Keywordscontent area literacy
teacher literacy identity
teacher professional development
AdvisorAnders, Patricia L.
Committee ChairAnders, Patricia L.
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherThe University of Arizona.
RightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
AbstractAdolescent literacy is currently viewed as in crisis. Moore (2002) argues that a focus on adolescent literate identity seems to be a key consideration when designing literacy instruction for secondary classrooms. This dissertation argues that in order for adolescents to develop a literate identity, their teachers should possess a literate identity.This phenomenological case study investigates the transformational paths nine developing teachers traversed as they "authored" their teacher literacy identity through a university content area literacy course, student teaching, and/or the induction period. "Authoring" includes both how the teachers represent their literacy identities in their writing and speaking, and how teachers do their literacy identities when enacting or performing (Moje, 2004) literacy instruction.Six instructional engagements completed by participants when they were students in a university content area literacy course comprise one data set. During student teaching and/or during their first or second year of teaching, three types of data were gathered: the Seidman (1998) three-interview series; a content area literacy lesson planning session; and an observation of each planned lesson. A phenomenological analysis (Merriam, 1998) guided the initial examination of the data. The data sets were analyzed using the constant comparative method (Bogdan & Biklen, 2007; Merriam, 1998).Teacher literacy identity is a previously unexplored construct. Based on a literature review and the voices of the participants, the following definition took shape: teacher literacy identity is a confident view of self as responsible for and in control of improving the literacy learning of self and the competency to enact engagements to guide the literacy learning of students. Teacher literacy identity consists of three transactional dimensions: the construct of literacy, the construct of literacy in practice, and the quality of the literacy enactment. Six major categories emerged to illustrate the phenomenon: identity, learning communities, personal agency, design of practice, literacy theories, and sources of dissonance.Implications of this exploration suggest that the investigation and documentation of developing teachers' literacy learning trajectories are worthy areas of further study. Moreover, a critical re-evaluation of teacher education and professional development in the support of teacher literacy identity deserves close attention.
Degree ProgramLanguage, Reading & Culture
Degree GrantorUniversity of Arizona
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Exploring the Experiences That Prompt Data Literacies: A Mixed Methods Research StudyCastek, Jill M.; Sheldon, Laurie; Johnson, Bruce; Orozco, Richard A. (The University of Arizona., 2023)Data permeates our digital world. As data and data visualizations become more ubiquitous in our everyday lives, individuals are required to use it as a resource for meaning making, and we as literacy researchers need to understand the ways that our literacy practices are changing because of data collection, storage, analysis, and transmission. Most work in data literacy has been focused on using data to achieve a desired outcome rather than helping individuals see themselves as capable of using data for multiple purposes and understanding data as a socially situated resource for meaning-making (Stornaiuolo, 2019). This mixed methods study investigated learners’ evolving understandings and thought processes as they used data for meaning making, including how they located, critically evaluated, synthesized, and communicated data in a graduate level, New Media and Learning course. Using a social constructivist theoretical framework, the New Literacies Theory of Change (Leu, et al., 2017) was used as a lens to understand the impacts of the Internet and technology on data literacies development. Experiential learning theory (Kolb 1984) was used to explore the impacts of the learners’ digital experiences with data on their developing understandings of data. Proudman’s (1992) conceptualization of Experiential Learning as an array of critical relationships 1) learner-to-self, 2) learner-to-others, and 3) learner-to-the world at large provided a framework for analyzing these experiences. Qualitative data sources included observational field notes, D2L discussion posts, learners’ multimodal work product, retrospective think alouds, and semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed deductively using theoretical thematic analysis (Braun & Clark, 2006) and inductively using pattern codes (Miles et al., 2020) that emerged from the deductive analysis. Quantitative data was gathered using a pre-post course survey, and descriptive statistics were used to describe the characteristics of the responses. Findings suggest that data literacies are a complex construct that require individuals to bring data into perspective and then re-examine it from multiple perspectives. Guided collaborative discussion is a key context for helping individuals to engage in this critical thinking about data in interdisciplinary ways. This study contributes to new literacies research on the changing nature of literacy in today’s social context of the Internet. It sheds new light on changing roles of educators in new literacies classrooms and on how educators can design instruction that helps learners move through the developmental trajectory of data literacies. Additional research, guided by the results of this study will lead to a deeper understanding of how individuals’ data literacies develop over time and what appears to prompt these changes.
Evaluating nursing faculty’s approach to information literacy instruction: a multi-institutional studyMcGowan, B.S.; Cantwell, L.P.; Conklin, J.L.; Raszewski, R.; Wolf, J.P.; Slebodnik, Maribeth; McCarthy, S.; Johnson, S.; Health Sciences Library, University of Arizona (University Library System, University of Pittsburgh, 2020-07)Objective: In 2018, the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) Health Sciences Interest Group convened a working group to update the 2013 Information Literacy Competency Standards for Nursing to be a companion document to the 2016 Framework for Information Literacy in Higher Education. To create this companion document, the working group first needed to understand how nursing faculty approached information literacy (IL) instruction. Methods: The working group designed a survey that assessed how nursing faculty utilized IL principles in coursework and instruction. The survey consisted of nineteen mixed methods questions and was distributed to nursing faculty at eight institutions across the United States. Results: Most (79%) faculty indicated that they use a variety of methods to teach IL principles in their courses. While only 12% of faculty incorporated a version of the ACRL IL competencies in course design, they were much more likely to integrate nursing educational association standards. Faculty perceptions of the relevance of IL skills increased as the education level being taught increased. Conclusion: The integration of IL instruction into nursing education has mostly been achieved through using standards from nursing educational associations. Understanding these standards and understanding how faculty perceptions of the relevance of IL skills change with educational levels will guide the development of a companion document that librarians can use to collaborate with nurse educators to integrate IL instruction throughout nursing curriculums at course and program levels.
Student perspectives on multimodal composing in the L2 classroom: tensions with audience, media, learning and sharingHellmich, Emily; Castek, Jill; Smith, Blaine E.; Floyd, Rachel; Wen, Wen; College of Humanities, French and Italian, University of Arizona; College of Education, University of Arizona; Second Language Acquisition and Teaching Program, University of Arizona (Emerald Group Holdings Ltd., 2021-02-08)Purpose: Multimodal composing is often romanticized as a flexible approach suitable for all learners. There is a lack of research that critically examines students’ perspectives and the constraints of multimodal composing across academic contexts. This study aims to address this need by exploring high school learners’ perspectives and experiences enacting multimodal learning in an L2 classroom. More specifically, this study presents key tensions between students’ experiences of multimodal composing and teacher/researchers’ use of multimodal composition in an L2 classroom setting. Design/methodology/approach: The paper focuses on two multimodal composing projects developed within a design-based implementation research approach and implemented in a high school French class. Multiple data sources were used: observations; interviews; written reflections; and multimodal compositions. Data were analyzed using the critical incident technique (CIT). A critical incident is one that is unplanned and that stimulates reflection on teaching and learning. Methodologically, CIT was enacted through iterative coding to identify critical incidents and collaborative analysis. Findings: Using illustrative examples from multiple data sources, this study discusses four tensions between students’ experiences of multimodal composing and teacher/researchers’ use of multimodal composition in a classroom setting: the primary audience of student projects, the media leveraged in student projects, expectations of learning in school and the role of a public viewing of student work. Originality/value: This paper problematizes basic assumptions and benefits of multimodal composing and offers ideas on how to re-center multimodal composing on student voices. © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.