Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBroussard, William James
dc.creatorBroussard, William Jamesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-06T13:46:20Z
dc.date.available2011-12-06T13:46:20Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/195290
dc.description.abstractIn "One Foot In: Student-Athlete Advocacy and Social Movement Rhetoric in the Margins of American College Athletics," the author explores student-athlete advocacy of black male student-athletes in revenue generating sports and educational and cultural reforms to NCAA policies and bylaws over approximately two decades (1985-2006). The author examines non-profit organizations--Black Coaches Association, Drake Group, Institute for Diversity and Ethics and Sport, and Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics--who pressured the NCAA to enact measures to restore order and balance to American college athletics. In addition, these measures are designed to increase student-athlete graduation rates, increase opportunities for minority coaches and administrators, and protect college educators who blow the whistle on institutions who commit infractions. The author begins by identifying social movement rhetorical strategies--the "Triple Front" strategy of Harold Cruse and Agitation/Control Rhetoric of Bowers, Ochs, and Jensen--to analyze rhetorical interactions between non-profit organizations and the NCAA, especially how the NCAA responds by using control rhetoric in order to protect itself from outside influences. Finally, the author ends the discussion by using autoethnography to analyze my own experiences as a writing program administrator challenging NCAA hegemony by running a progressive writing program within a traditional student-athlete study hall.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectCollege Athleticsen_US
dc.subjectNCAAen_US
dc.subjectHigher Educationen_US
dc.subjectSocial Movement Rhetoricen_US
dc.subjectNon-Profit-Organizationsen_US
dc.subjectWriting Program Administrationen_US
dc.titleOne Foot In: Student-Athlete Advocacy and Social Movement Rhetoric in the Margins of American College Athleticsen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeElectronic Dissertationen_US
dc.contributor.chairMountford, Roxanneen_US
dc.identifier.oclc659747220en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberHall, Anne-Marieen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberLeSeur-Brown, Getaen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberHawhee, Debraen_US
dc.identifier.proquest2111en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineRhetoric, Composition & the Teaching of Englishen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.namePhDen_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-25T07:15:43Z
html.description.abstractIn "One Foot In: Student-Athlete Advocacy and Social Movement Rhetoric in the Margins of American College Athletics," the author explores student-athlete advocacy of black male student-athletes in revenue generating sports and educational and cultural reforms to NCAA policies and bylaws over approximately two decades (1985-2006). The author examines non-profit organizations--Black Coaches Association, Drake Group, Institute for Diversity and Ethics and Sport, and Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics--who pressured the NCAA to enact measures to restore order and balance to American college athletics. In addition, these measures are designed to increase student-athlete graduation rates, increase opportunities for minority coaches and administrators, and protect college educators who blow the whistle on institutions who commit infractions. The author begins by identifying social movement rhetorical strategies--the "Triple Front" strategy of Harold Cruse and Agitation/Control Rhetoric of Bowers, Ochs, and Jensen--to analyze rhetorical interactions between non-profit organizations and the NCAA, especially how the NCAA responds by using control rhetoric in order to protect itself from outside influences. Finally, the author ends the discussion by using autoethnography to analyze my own experiences as a writing program administrator challenging NCAA hegemony by running a progressive writing program within a traditional student-athlete study hall.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_etd_2111_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
714.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
azu_etd_2111_sip1_m.pdf

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record