IRON BIOMINERALIZATION: IMPLICATIONS ON THE FATE OF ARSENIC IN LANDFILLS

Abstract

The new Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of arsenic in drinking water has caused a significant increase in the volume of arsenic-bearing solid residuals (ABSR) generated by drinking water utilities. Iron sorbents are being widely utilized for water treatment and comprise the bulk of the waste generated. Based on Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) results, these ABSR may be disposed in municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills. However unlike the conditions in the TCLP, a mature landfill is a biotic, reducing environment where iron and arsenic may be reduced and, as a consequence, arsenic may be released to the leachate. The primary route of iron reduction in landfills is microbially mediated and biomineralization is a common by-product. In this case, biomineralization is the transformation of ferric (hydr)oxides into ferrous iron crystalline forms, such as siderite, vivianite and iron sulfide, and into mixed valent mineral forms, such as magnetite and green rust. In this work, biomineralization is evaluated as a possible process to control arsenic leaching from ABSR in landfills. Understanding biomineralization impacts, however, requires a precise knowledge of the various mechanisms of arsenic release under landfill conditions. To this end, we describe flow-through laboratory column experiments in which controlled conditions similar to those found in a mature landfill prevail. In these simulated landfill column experiments, the results show that biomineralization would naturally occur in typical non-hazardous MSW landfills. Without any intervention, As leaching was higher than 80% of the initial quantity loaded, in contrast to Fe leaching values, which were less than 10% of the initial quantity loaded. Phosphate and bicarbonate played an important role in the experiments, as probably arsenic competitors for sorption sites and as components of the secondary iron mineral phases, vivianite and siderite respectively. Although these minerals have less surface area and adsorption capacity than AFH, they were a key constituent on the retention of the As that was left in the columns by re-adsorbing As species, and more important by coating the AFH with some of the initially loaded As.