We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until November 22nd, 2024 - no new submissions will be accepted; however, all content already published will remain publicly available. Please reach out to repository@u.library.arizona.edu with your questions, or if you are a UA affiliate who needs to make content available soon. Note that any new user accounts created after September 22, 2024 will need to be recreated by the user in November after our migration is completed.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClark-Miller, Kristi Marie
dc.creatorClark-Miller, Kristi Marieen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-06T13:55:47Z
dc.date.available2011-12-06T13:55:47Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/195518
dc.description.abstractAdoption is a social institution that is continually evolving in order to meet the needs of children and adults. The research presented in this dissertation focuses on measuring the current cultural sentiments about the practice of adoption and assessing the stigmatization of adoption and the identities of adoptive parent and adopted child. Drawing from Bruce Link and Jo Phelan's conceptualization of stigma and the assumptions of Affect Control Theory, I provide evidence that adoption and thus adoptive families continue to be stigmatized in the United States. My data indicate that adoptive parents and children are socially differentiated from parents and children who are biologically related. Adopted children, particularly children adopted out of foster care, are perceived more negatively than children who are not. The stereotypical traits predicted by Affect Control Theory for adoptive parents and adopted children indicate that these identities are more negative and notably less powerful than those for biological parents and children. In addition, the expected behavioral patterns between adoptive parents and their adopted children are more ambivalent and less supportive than those of biological children and parents. The predictions made in this work must be tested in future research.
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectadoptionen_US
dc.subjectstigmaen_US
dc.subjectidentityen_US
dc.subjectaffect control theoryen_US
dc.subjectfamilyen_US
dc.titleThe Adoptive Identity: Stigma and Social Interactionen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeElectronic Dissertationen_US
dc.contributor.chairWalker, Henry A.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc137355331en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizonaen_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSmith-Lovin, Lynnen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMolm, Linda D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberRoth, Louise M.en_US
dc.identifier.proquest1374en_US
thesis.degree.disciplineSociologyen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineGraduate Collegeen_US
thesis.degree.namePhDen_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-06-13T07:26:13Z
html.description.abstractAdoption is a social institution that is continually evolving in order to meet the needs of children and adults. The research presented in this dissertation focuses on measuring the current cultural sentiments about the practice of adoption and assessing the stigmatization of adoption and the identities of adoptive parent and adopted child. Drawing from Bruce Link and Jo Phelan's conceptualization of stigma and the assumptions of Affect Control Theory, I provide evidence that adoption and thus adoptive families continue to be stigmatized in the United States. My data indicate that adoptive parents and children are socially differentiated from parents and children who are biologically related. Adopted children, particularly children adopted out of foster care, are perceived more negatively than children who are not. The stereotypical traits predicted by Affect Control Theory for adoptive parents and adopted children indicate that these identities are more negative and notably less powerful than those for biological parents and children. In addition, the expected behavioral patterns between adoptive parents and their adopted children are more ambivalent and less supportive than those of biological children and parents. The predictions made in this work must be tested in future research.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
azu_etd_1374_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
1.032Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
azu_etd_1374_sip1_m.pdf

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record