Should I Stay or Should I Go? The Influence of Habitat Quality on Movement Patterns in Northern Crayfish (Orconectes virilis)
Name:
azu_etd_10519_sip1_m.pdf
Size:
1.133Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
azu_etd_10519_sip1_m.pdf
Author
Craddock, CherylIssue Date
2009Advisor
Mannan, R. W.Committee Chair
Mannan, R. W.
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
The University of Arizona.Rights
Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.Abstract
Observations of animal distributions have revealed that population densities have tracked resource quality. Various models have been proposed to account for such “resource matching.” For example, the Ideal Free Distribution (Fretwell and Lucas 1970) model employs habitat selection rules which assume mobile animals evaluate available habitat patches and select the highest quality patch first. I examined movement patterns of northern crayfish (Orconectes virilis) in response to habitat patches of different quality to test this assumption. I found that animals were more likely to leave a low quality patch than a high quality patch even when there were no other patches available, suggesting that the quality of encountered resources plays a significant role in subsequent decisions about movement. However, many animals did not leave the first patch they encountered, even when better habitat existed elsewhere and was well within their ability to sample it. Finally, not all crayfish selected the best site they encountered. My studies demonstrate that the response to resources is complex, and IFDs and other distribution models may rely on overly simplified assumptions about habitat selection behavior.Type
textElectronic Dissertation
Degree Name
Ph.D.Degree Level
doctoralDegree Program
Natural ResourcesGraduate College