• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Colleges, Departments, and Organizations
    • College of Agriculture, Life & Environmental Sciences (CALES) Publications
    • Production Reports
    • Cotton Reports
    • Cotton Report 2000
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Colleges, Departments, and Organizations
    • College of Agriculture, Life & Environmental Sciences (CALES) Publications
    • Production Reports
    • Cotton Reports
    • Cotton Report 2000
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Use of Insect Growth Regulators and Changing Whitefly Control Costs in Arizona Cotton

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    az11707g-2000.pdf
    Size:
    29.58Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Agnew, G. Ken
    Frisvold, George B.
    Baker, Paul
    Issue Date
    2000
    Keywords
    Agriculture -- Arizona
    Cotton -- Arizona
    Insect investigations
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
    Journal
    Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report
    Abstract
    In 1996, two Insect Growth Regulators (IGRs), pyriproxyfen (Knack®) and buprofezin (Applaud®) became available to Arizona cotton growers for control of whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii under a Section 18 EPA exemption. This study makes use of a section-level database to examine (a) factors explaining IGR adoption and (b) how adopters of IGRs altered their overall insecticide use to control whiteflies. IGR adoption can be explained to a large extent by location effects. Adoption was more likely on sections where an index of whitefly susceptibility to synergized pyrethroids was low and on sections with higher whitefly control costs in the previous year. Adoption was inversely related to local population density. On sections where growers adopted IGRs, expenditures on synergized pyrethroid and other whitefly-specific tank mix applications fell by $62.52 per acre. On sections with no IGR adoption, tank mix expenditures fell less, by $44.37 per acre. On adopting sections, net costs of controlling whiteflies fell by $29.62 per acre, or by over $11,000 per farm.
    Series/Report no.
    AZ1170
    Collections
    Cotton Report 2000

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.