Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNorton, E. R.
dc.contributor.authorSilvertooth, J. C.
dc.contributor.editorSilvertooth, Jeffen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-15T21:08:12Z
dc.date.available2011-12-15T21:08:12Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/197515
dc.description.abstractA single field study was conducted on a sodium-affected soil at the University of Arizona’s Maricopa Agricultural Center (MAC) in 1999. Deltapine DP33B was dry planted and watered-up on 13 April 1999. Two treatments were evaluated; treatment 1 received no acid and treatment 2 received water-run acid applications. The acid used in this evaluation was sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and was applied at approximately 11 gallons acid/acre at each scheduled irrigation throughout the entire growing season. All other agronomic inputs and decisions were uniformly applied to both treatments. Lint yields were not significantly different.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAZ1170en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectSoil fertility and soil managementen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of an Arid Soil Conditioner in an Irrigated Cotton Production Systemen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalCotton: A College of Agriculture Reporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-05-18T09:56:21Z
html.description.abstractA single field study was conducted on a sodium-affected soil at the University of Arizona’s Maricopa Agricultural Center (MAC) in 1999. Deltapine DP33B was dry planted and watered-up on 13 April 1999. Two treatments were evaluated; treatment 1 received no acid and treatment 2 received water-run acid applications. The acid used in this evaluation was sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and was applied at approximately 11 gallons acid/acre at each scheduled irrigation throughout the entire growing season. All other agronomic inputs and decisions were uniformly applied to both treatments. Lint yields were not significantly different.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
az11706g-2000.pdf
Size:
28.22Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record