We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until November 22nd, 2024 - no new submissions will be accepted; however, all content already published will remain publicly available. Please reach out to repository@u.library.arizona.edu with your questions, or if you are a UA affiliate who needs to make content available soon. Note that any new user accounts created after September 22, 2024 will need to be recreated by the user in November after our migration is completed.
Citrus Orchard Floor Management 2001-2003: Comparison of a Disk, “Perfecta” Cultivator, and Weed Sensing Sprayer
| dc.contributor.author | Rector, Ryan J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | McCloskey, William B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wright, Glenn C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sumner, Chris | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Wright, Glenn | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-12-20T19:11:46Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-12-20T19:11:46Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/198100 | |
| dc.description.abstract | An optical weed sensing sprayer (WeedSeeker) was evaluated for making postemergence glyphosate herbicide applications in a Yuma, AZ lemon orchard. In addition, mechanical (disk and Perfecta cultivator) and chemical weed control strategies were compared. Results were fairly similar; however, the use of the WeedSeeker units combined with a preemergence herbicide (H1) increased weed control three fold compared to disking (D) and perfecta (P1). Additionally, when the WeedSeeker units were used in conjunction with preemergence herbicides, spray volume was reduced by 66% compared to a conventional sprayer and by 57% when used for postemergence applications only. There was a relationship between weed ground cover and the area sprayed by the WeedSeeker units indicating that maximum postemergence herbicide savings will occur at low weed densities or less than 10% groundcover. The use of a sprayer with an improved suspension system allowed for faster spraying speeds than were possible with the tractor mounted sprayer. Weed control was similar for the conventional and the WeedSeeker sprayer. However, yields were variable for both years. Future investigations will include efforts to develop crop budgets based on experimental operations | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Arizona Citrus Research Council | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | AZ1331 | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Series P-137 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Agriculture -- Arizona | en_US |
| dc.subject | Citrus fruits -- Arizona | en_US |
| dc.subject | Orchard floor management | en_US |
| dc.title | Citrus Orchard Floor Management 2001-2003: Comparison of a Disk, “Perfecta” Cultivator, and Weed Sensing Sprayer | en_US |
| dc.type | text | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Plant Sciences, Yuma Mesa Agricultural Center, University of Arizona, Yuma, Arizona | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Yuma County Pest Abatement District, Yuma, Arizona | en_US |
| dc.identifier.journal | Citrus Research Report | en_US |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-08-25T15:14:38Z | |
| html.description.abstract | An optical weed sensing sprayer (WeedSeeker) was evaluated for making postemergence glyphosate herbicide applications in a Yuma, AZ lemon orchard. In addition, mechanical (disk and Perfecta cultivator) and chemical weed control strategies were compared. Results were fairly similar; however, the use of the WeedSeeker units combined with a preemergence herbicide (H1) increased weed control three fold compared to disking (D) and perfecta (P1). Additionally, when the WeedSeeker units were used in conjunction with preemergence herbicides, spray volume was reduced by 66% compared to a conventional sprayer and by 57% when used for postemergence applications only. There was a relationship between weed ground cover and the area sprayed by the WeedSeeker units indicating that maximum postemergence herbicide savings will occur at low weed densities or less than 10% groundcover. The use of a sprayer with an improved suspension system allowed for faster spraying speeds than were possible with the tractor mounted sprayer. Weed control was similar for the conventional and the WeedSeeker sprayer. However, yields were variable for both years. Future investigations will include efforts to develop crop budgets based on experimental operations |
