Browsing Cotton Report 1995 by Authors
The 1995 Arizona Cotton Advisory ProgramBrown, P.; Russell, B.; Silvertooth, J.; Ellsworth, P.; Stedman, S.; Thacker, G.; Husman, S.; Cluff, R.; Howell, D.; Winans, S.; et al. (College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1995-03)Arizona Cooperative Extension generates and distributes weather -based Planting Date and Cotton Development Advisories for 11 cotton production areas (Marana, Laveen, Paloma, Litchfield Pk., Pinal Co., Parker, Mohave Valley, Queen Creek, Safford, Yuma Valley, and Aguila). Planting Date Advisories are distributed from mid- February through the end of April and stress 1) planting cotton varieties according to heat unit accumulations rather than calendar date and 2) the importance of soil temperature to good germination. Cotton Development Advisories are distributed from early May through mid -September and provide updates on crop development, insects, weather and agronomy. The Cotton Advisory Program will continue in 1994 and growers may obtain the advisories by mail or fax from the local county extension office, and by computer from the AZMET computer bulletin board. Improved normal weather statistics and the addition of an advisory for Cochise County are the main changes planned for the 1995 program.
Arizona Upland Cotton Variety Testing ProgramSilvertooth, J.; Norton, R.; Clark, L.; Husman, S.; Cluff, R.; Stedman, S.; Thacker, G.; Grumbles, R.; Silvertooth, Jeff; University of Arizona Cooperative Extension (College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1995-03)Ten field experiments were conducted in many of the cotton growing areas of Arizona in 1994 for the purpose of evaluating Upland cotton varieties in terms of adaptability and performance. Seven commercial cottonseed companies participated in the program. Two varieties were submitted from each company at each location. Experiments were conducted on grower- cooperator fields in each case. Locations used in the program spanned the range of conditions common to cotton producing areas of the state from about 500 ft. to 4,000 ft. elevation. Results indicated a broad range of adaptability and competitiveness on the part of each of the participating companies and their representative varieties. Each of the companies offers a compliment of varieties that can serve to match various production strategies commonly employed in the state as well as showing a strong capacity to be regionally adaptive.