Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTickes, Barry
dc.contributor.editorOttman, Michaelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-10T17:03:23Z
dc.date.available2012-01-10T17:03:23Z
dc.date.issued1992-09
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/201364
dc.description.abstractA test was conducted to evaluate the effect that renovating a weak alfalfa stand had upon yields in one field in the Yuma Valley. Results indicated that yields were not significantly different in the renovated vs. the not renovated plots. Under the conditions present in this test, there appeared to be no yield advantage to renovation during the first year.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries370092en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-92en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectGrain -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectForage plants -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectAlfalfa -- Arizonaen_US
dc.titleAlfalfa Renovationen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalForage and Grain: A College of Agriculture Reporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-06-19T09:24:44Z
html.description.abstractA test was conducted to evaluate the effect that renovating a weak alfalfa stand had upon yields in one field in the Yuma Valley. Results indicated that yields were not significantly different in the renovated vs. the not renovated plots. Under the conditions present in this test, there appeared to be no yield advantage to renovation during the first year.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
370092-006-007.pdf
Size:
53.40Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record