• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Colleges, Departments, and Organizations
    • College of Agriculture, Life & Environmental Sciences (CALES) Publications
    • Production Reports
    • Forage & Grain Reports
    • Forage & Grain Report 1997
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Colleges, Departments, and Organizations
    • College of Agriculture, Life & Environmental Sciences (CALES) Publications
    • Production Reports
    • Forage & Grain Reports
    • Forage & Grain Report 1997
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Comparisons of Lorsban 4E and Spinosad 4SC for Control of Summer Insects in Alfalfa

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    370110-015-021.pdf
    Size:
    197.2Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Rethwisch, Michael D.
    Kruse, Elizabeth
    Kruse, Michael D.
    Issue Date
    1997-10
    Keywords
    Agriculture -- Arizona
    Grain -- Arizona
    Forage plants -- Arizona
    Alfalfa -- Arizona
    Alfalfa -- General production practices
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
    Journal
    Forage and Grain: A College of Agriculture Report
    Abstract
    Anew chemistry (Spinosad 4SC) was tested for control of beet armyworm and other summers insects in alfalfa. This product did not control beet armyworms as well as the top of label rate of Lorsban 4E, and at one day post treatment had more beet armyworms than the lowest rate of Lorsban tested At three days post treatment both rates of Spinosad 4SC had fewer beet armyworms than the lowest rate of Lorsban tested. Few differences were noted between Spinosad 4SC for beet armyworm control, although fewer alfalfa caterpillars were noted with usage of the higher Spinosad rate, although significantly more beneficial insects were noted at three days post treatment with the lower rate of Spinosad. Lorsban chemistries significantly lowered yellows and hopperburn damage ratings compared with other treatments and a difference was noted between the two Spinosad rates although Empoasca sp. leafhopper numbers were similar.
    Series/Report no.
    370110
    Series P-110
    Collections
    Forage & Grain Report 1997

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.