Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThacker, Gary W.
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-24T17:19:02Z
dc.date.available2012-01-24T17:19:02Z
dc.date.issued1987-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/204459
dc.description.abstractIn a preliminary, unreplicated test, cotton was planted in 40 inch and 27 inch rows on April 10 and again on May 1. Narrow rows outyielded 40 inch rows at both planting dates. The yield difference between the row spacing treatments was greatest in the May 1 planting. Both row spacings had higher yields when planted on the later date, as did both the DPL 90 and ST506 varieties used in the test.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries370069en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-69en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Planting seeden_US
dc.titleNarrow Row Cotton Evaluation, Marana Agricultural Centeren_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalCotton: A College of Agriculture Reporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-07-01T12:05:36Z
html.description.abstractIn a preliminary, unreplicated test, cotton was planted in 40 inch and 27 inch rows on April 10 and again on May 1. Narrow rows outyielded 40 inch rows at both planting dates. The yield difference between the row spacing treatments was greatest in the May 1 planting. Both row spacings had higher yields when planted on the later date, as did both the DPL 90 and ST506 varieties used in the test.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
370069-054-055.pdf
Size:
23.08Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record