Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKittock, D. L.*
dc.contributor.authorHofmann, W. C.*
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-24T17:19:50Z
dc.date.available2012-01-24T17:19:50Z
dc.date.issued1987-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/204474
dc.description.abstractThere were some wide variations in cotton variety performance at five planting dates among locations and years. However, on an average, DP 90 and DP 77 performed best when planted between 28 March and 24 April. Stoneville 506 and DP 50 averaged best for May plantings and DP 20, Stoneville 112, and DP 50 averaged best for early June plantings.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries370069en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-69en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Planting ratesen_US
dc.subjectCotton - Datesen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Short season cottonen_US
dc.titleLint Yield of Several Cotton Varieties Planted on 5 Dates at 3 Locations in Arizona in 1986en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalCotton: A College of Agriculture Reporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-06-24T17:03:11Z
html.description.abstractThere were some wide variations in cotton variety performance at five planting dates among locations and years. However, on an average, DP 90 and DP 77 performed best when planted between 28 March and 24 April. Stoneville 506 and DP 50 averaged best for May plantings and DP 20, Stoneville 112, and DP 50 averaged best for early June plantings.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
370069-057-062.pdf
Size:
63.84Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record