Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThacker, Gary
dc.contributor.authorRein, Brad
dc.contributor.authorSilvertooth, Jeff
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-24T18:28:34Z
dc.date.available2012-01-24T18:28:34Z
dc.date.issued1988-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/204524
dc.description.abstractThis test was conducted on the LDS Church Farm in Marana to determine whether ripping after the Uprooter-Shredder-Mulcher (USM) benefits yields. The three treatments were rip furrows only, rip -beds only, and no ripping after the USM. Depth of water penetration was measured after the preplant irrigation; no significant differences were observed between the treatments. Differences in lint yields were not statistically significant, although average lint yields for the ripped treatments were higher.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries370072en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-72en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Crop managementen_US
dc.titleRipping After the Uprooter-Shredder-Mulcheren_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalCotton: A College of Agriculture Reporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-06-25T02:54:42Z
html.description.abstractThis test was conducted on the LDS Church Farm in Marana to determine whether ripping after the Uprooter-Shredder-Mulcher (USM) benefits yields. The three treatments were rip furrows only, rip -beds only, and no ripping after the USM. Depth of water penetration was measured after the preplant irrigation; no significant differences were observed between the treatments. Differences in lint yields were not statistically significant, although average lint yields for the ripped treatments were higher.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
370072-093-094.pdf
Size:
29.88Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record