Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBiggs, E. Niel
dc.contributor.authorClark, Lee J.
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-24T18:39:46Z
dc.date.available2012-01-24T18:39:46Z
dc.date.issued1988-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/204545
dc.description.abstractCotton was grown using a computer model to schedule irrigation; yields of 2.5 bales per acre were produced. Even though some discrepancies were seen between calculated and measured soil moistures, the model was considered successful. No yield differences were seen between cotton grown with small, frequent irrigations and large, infrequent irrigations. The plant heights, however, were significantly altered.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries370072en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-72en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Irrigationen_US
dc.titleIrrigated Cotton, Safford Agricultural Center, 1986en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalCotton: A College of Agriculture Reporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-07-14T23:37:04Z
html.description.abstractCotton was grown using a computer model to schedule irrigation; yields of 2.5 bales per acre were produced. Even though some discrepancies were seen between calculated and measured soil moistures, the model was considered successful. No yield differences were seen between cotton grown with small, frequent irrigations and large, infrequent irrigations. The plant heights, however, were significantly altered.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
370072-155-159.pdf
Size:
68.60Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record