Response of Cotton to Various Fertilization Histories
| dc.contributor.author | Hofmann, W. C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Else, P. T. | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Silvertooth, Jeff | en_US |
| dc.contributor.editor | Isbell, Joan | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-01-25T18:34:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-01-25T18:34:16Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1989-03 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/204813 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Effects of various fertilization histories on cotton yield were investigated for the fourth consecutive year in the same field at the Maricopa Agricultural Center. Treatments included: 1) no fertilizers added for the past 4 seasons, 2) aggressive nitrogen fertilization in the 1988 season, no fertilization for the previous 3 seasons, 3) standard nitrogen fertilization in 1988 similar treatment for the previous 3 seasons, 4) aggressive nitrogen fertilization in 1988 same history as treatment #3 for previous 3 seasons, and 5) a commercial alternative fertilization program (BioHumaNetics, Inc.). Yields in 1988 were significantly different with treatment 2 having the highest yield followed by treatments 3 and 4, followed by treatment 5; treatment 1 had the lowest yield. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | 370077 | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Series P-77 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Agriculture -- Arizona | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cotton -- Arizona | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cotton -- Soil fertility | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cotton -- Management | en_US |
| dc.title | Response of Cotton to Various Fertilization Histories | en_US |
| dc.type | text | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.journal | Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report | en_US |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-05-29T11:48:50Z | |
| html.description.abstract | Effects of various fertilization histories on cotton yield were investigated for the fourth consecutive year in the same field at the Maricopa Agricultural Center. Treatments included: 1) no fertilizers added for the past 4 seasons, 2) aggressive nitrogen fertilization in the 1988 season, no fertilization for the previous 3 seasons, 3) standard nitrogen fertilization in 1988 similar treatment for the previous 3 seasons, 4) aggressive nitrogen fertilization in 1988 same history as treatment #3 for previous 3 seasons, and 5) a commercial alternative fertilization program (BioHumaNetics, Inc.). Yields in 1988 were significantly different with treatment 2 having the highest yield followed by treatments 3 and 4, followed by treatment 5; treatment 1 had the lowest yield. |
