Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClark, L. J.
dc.contributor.authorCarpenter, E. W.
dc.contributor.authorOdom, P. N.
dc.contributor.editorSilvertooth, Jeffen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-06T18:00:58Z
dc.date.available2012-02-06T18:00:58Z
dc.date.issued1994-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/209609
dc.description.abstractExperiments were effected on both Pima and upland cotton to compare the defoliation effects of Ginstar, Starfire and sodium chlorate with an untreated check Weather conditions after treatment applications were recorded and observations taken after one week and two weeks. Grab samples were taken from the picker to determine percent trash and to run HVI analyses.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries370096en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-96en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Crop managementen_US
dc.titleDefoliation of Pima and Upland Cotton at the Safford Agricultural Center, 1993en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalCotton: A College of Agriculture Reporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-07-03T05:20:43Z
html.description.abstractExperiments were effected on both Pima and upland cotton to compare the defoliation effects of Ginstar, Starfire and sodium chlorate with an untreated check Weather conditions after treatment applications were recorded and observations taken after one week and two weeks. Grab samples were taken from the picker to determine percent trash and to run HVI analyses.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
370096-067-075.pdf
Size:
116.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record