Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoffett, Jody
dc.contributor.authorMcCloskey, William B.
dc.contributor.authorHusman, Stephen H.
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Gary L.
dc.contributor.editorSilvertooth, Jeffen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-06T18:22:07Z
dc.date.available2012-02-06T18:22:07Z
dc.date.issued1994-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/209635
dc.description.abstractTwo dinitroaniline herbicides, Prowl and Treflan, were tested in field experiments with cotton to determine their differences, if any, in terms of weed control and crop injury potential. Plots treated with the lowest rate of Treflan (0.125 lb a.i./A at one location and 0.25 lb a.i./A at a second location) exhibited reduced weed control in comparison to the other herbicide treatments. Although root inhibition was slight, lateral root growth of cotton was inhibited more by the higher rates of Treflan (0.75 and 1.0 lb a.i./A) than by the higher rates of Prowl (1.0 and 1.25 lb a.i./A). However, differences in weed control and crop injury were not reflected in differences in cotton stand counts, height measurements and yield as there were no significant differences in these parameters between treatments.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries370096en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-96en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Weed controlen_US
dc.titleDo Prowl and Treflan Cause Cotton Injury?en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalCotton: A College of Agriculture Reporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-18T18:55:43Z
html.description.abstractTwo dinitroaniline herbicides, Prowl and Treflan, were tested in field experiments with cotton to determine their differences, if any, in terms of weed control and crop injury potential. Plots treated with the lowest rate of Treflan (0.125 lb a.i./A at one location and 0.25 lb a.i./A at a second location) exhibited reduced weed control in comparison to the other herbicide treatments. Although root inhibition was slight, lateral root growth of cotton was inhibited more by the higher rates of Treflan (0.75 and 1.0 lb a.i./A) than by the higher rates of Prowl (1.0 and 1.25 lb a.i./A). However, differences in weed control and crop injury were not reflected in differences in cotton stand counts, height measurements and yield as there were no significant differences in these parameters between treatments.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
370096-244-248.pdf
Size:
59.56Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record