Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKerns, David L.
dc.contributor.authorTellez, Tony
dc.contributor.editorSilvertooth, Jeffen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-09T18:15:09Z
dc.date.available2012-02-09T18:15:09Z
dc.date.issued1998-04
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/210365
dc.description.abstractExperimental insecticides were evaluated for control of sweet potato whiteflies relative to a commercial standard in cotton. Ni-25 provided excellent whitefly control and was equivalent to the commercial standard (Knack followed by Danitol + Orthene). Fenoxycarb + pymetrozine provided goodwhitefly control but seemed to require 2 sequential applications before control was equivalent to Ni-25. Diofenolan + pymetrozine appeared to be a slightly weaker treatment, but still provided acceptable whitefly control.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAZ1006en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCotton -- Insect investigationsen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of Experimental Insecticides for Whitefly Control in Cotton, 1996en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalCotton: A College of Agriculture Reporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-08-18T03:26:16Z
html.description.abstractExperimental insecticides were evaluated for control of sweet potato whiteflies relative to a commercial standard in cotton. Ni-25 provided excellent whitefly control and was equivalent to the commercial standard (Knack followed by Danitol + Orthene). Fenoxycarb + pymetrozine provided goodwhitefly control but seemed to require 2 sequential applications before control was equivalent to Ni-25. Diofenolan + pymetrozine appeared to be a slightly weaker treatment, but still provided acceptable whitefly control.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
AZ1006-367-377.pdf
Size:
148.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record