• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Colleges, Departments, and Organizations
    • College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS) Publications
    • Production Reports
    • Cotton Reports
    • Cotton Report 1996
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Colleges, Departments, and Organizations
    • College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS) Publications
    • Production Reports
    • Cotton Reports
    • Cotton Report 1996
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Evaluation of Soil Conditioners and Water Treatments for Cotton Production Systems

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    370103-349-355.pdf
    Size:
    124.9Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Silvertooth, J. C.
    Sanchez, C. A.
    Norton, E. R.
    Issue Date
    1996-03
    Keywords
    Agriculture -- Arizona
    Cotton -- Arizona
    Cotton -- Soil fertility
    Cotton -- Soil management
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
    Journal
    Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report
    Abstract
    Advanced technologies to produce synthetic polymers such as polyacrylamide (PAM, and polymaleic anhydride (PMA) have produced products which may be economically feasible alternatives to traditional treatments such as gypsum in the desert Southwest. In 1995 a single field study was conducted at Paloma Ranch, west of Gila Bend in Maricopa County Arizona Upland Nucoton 35, DPL' was dry planted and watered -up on 10 and 11 April. Treatments consisted of various rates and times of applications of Sper Sal™, which included a check (no Sper Sal), 1 and 2 qts. /acre with the water-up irrigation; 1 and 2 qts./acre with a mid - season irrigation; and 1 qt. /acre mid-season following 1 or 2 qts./acre with the water -up irrigation. No differences among treatments were detected among any treatments in terms of plant growth and development or final lint yields. There were no early-season differences in soil crusting among the various soil amendment treatments in 1995, as opposed to 1994 when a severe rain occurred immediately following planting.
    Series/Report no.
    Series P-103
    370103
    Collections
    Cotton Report 1996

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.