Side-Dress Temik® Effects on Lint Yields
dc.contributor.author | Husman, S. H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Deeter, B. | |
dc.contributor.editor | Silvertooth, Jeff | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-16T18:03:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-02-16T18:03:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1997-03 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/211107 | |
dc.description.abstract | Temik 15G was side -dressed at a rate of 7 lb./acre and 14 lb./acre and compared to an untreated check in two experiments in Buckeye, Az.. Treatments were made prior to the second in- season irrigation (June 3 and June 5) which was just prior to early bloom. Lygus counts were taken using a sweep net on weekly intervals for six weeks post application. The first experiment resulted in a significant increase of 123 lb. and 1241b. lint in both the 7 and 14 lb. rate treatment respectively over the untreated check. The second experiment resulted in a significant 102 lb. lint increase for the 7 lb. treatment with no significant difference for the 14 lb. treatment to the check. | |
dc.language | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 370108 | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Series P-108 | en_US |
dc.subject | Agriculture -- Arizona | en_US |
dc.subject | Cotton -- Arizona | en_US |
dc.subject | Cotton -- Insect investigations | en_US |
dc.title | Side-Dress Temik® Effects on Lint Yields | |
dc.type | text | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report | en_US |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-06-29T07:28:32Z | |
html.description.abstract | Temik 15G was side -dressed at a rate of 7 lb./acre and 14 lb./acre and compared to an untreated check in two experiments in Buckeye, Az.. Treatments were made prior to the second in- season irrigation (June 3 and June 5) which was just prior to early bloom. Lygus counts were taken using a sweep net on weekly intervals for six weeks post application. The first experiment resulted in a significant increase of 123 lb. and 1241b. lint in both the 7 and 14 lb. rate treatment respectively over the untreated check. The second experiment resulted in a significant 102 lb. lint increase for the 7 lb. treatment with no significant difference for the 14 lb. treatment to the check. |